What is the difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.47/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.47/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Which Is Better?

Updated Apr 2026

Our Verdict

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 9.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Input

$0.13

4.6× cheaper

Output

$0.40

9.0× cheaper

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

Output

$3.60

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 4.6× input, 9.0× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

82%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

58%Vocabulary54%

18wSentence Length14w

0.31Hedging0.39

6.8Bold6.9

3.3Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.23

0.74Headings0.93

0.15Transitions0.17

Based on 27 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Updated Apr 2026

Our Verdict

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 9.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Input

$0.13

4.6× cheaper

Output

$0.40

9.0× cheaper

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

Output

$3.60

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 4.6× input, 9.0× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

82%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

58%Vocabulary54%

18wSentence Length14w

0.31Hedging0.39

6.8Bold6.9

3.3Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.23

0.74Headings0.93

0.15Transitions0.17

Based on 27 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider