Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Llama 4 Maverick?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 262K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Llama 4 Maverick
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by google while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 12× input, 6.3× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window.
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 6.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Llama 4 Maverick uses 2.5x more hedging
