Rival
Sign Up

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Claude Opus 4

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 262K vs 200K, tested across 29 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Claude Opus 4?

Google: Gemma 4 31B and Claude Opus 4 are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 262K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Claude Opus 4

Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 31B is 188x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Claude Opus 4 uses 3.4x more sentence length

Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Opus 4
57%Vocabulary64%
18wSentence Length62w
0.37Hedging0.52
7.1Bold4.4
4.0Lists9.1
0.24Emoji0.11
0.94Headings1.87
0.16Transitions0.27
Based on 23 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 31BClaude Opus 4
FAQ
Keep going
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoGPT-5 logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5New provider
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoMiniMax M1 logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MiniMax M1New provider
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoClaude Sonnet 4 logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Claude Sonnet 4Cross-provider