Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MiniMax M1

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 21 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or MiniMax M1?

Google: Gemma 4 31B and MiniMax M1 are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1. Context windows: 262K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and MiniMax M1

Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while MiniMax M1 is from minimax. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to MiniMax M1's 1000K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B
MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 31B is 4.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 5.0x more transitions

Google: Gemma 4 31B
MiniMax M1
57%Vocabulary53%
18wSentence Length17w
0.37Hedging0.51
7.1Bold7.4
4.0Lists6.2
0.24Emoji0.10
0.94Headings0.86
0.16Transitions0.03
Based on 23 + 14 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 31BMiniMax M1
FAQ