Rival
Sign Up

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Claude Opus 4.1

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic, context windows of 262K vs 200K, tested across 23 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Claude Opus 4.1?

Google: Gemma 4 31B and Claude Opus 4.1 are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.1. Context windows: 262K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Claude Opus 4.1

Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while Claude Opus 4.1 is from anthropic. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4.1's 200K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.1.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 31B is 188x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Claude Opus 4.1 uses 4.8x more sentence length

Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Opus 4.1
57%Vocabulary61%
18wSentence Length87w
0.37Hedging0.54
7.1Bold5.1
4.0Lists6.7
0.24Emoji0.38
0.94Headings1.68
0.16Transitions0.13
Based on 23 + 17 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 31BClaude Opus 4.1
FAQ
Keep going
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoGPT-5 logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5New provider
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider