Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Llama 4 Maverick?

Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 262K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Maverick

Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 31B is 6.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 31B
Llama 4 Maverick
57%Vocabulary42%
18wSentence Length24w
0.37Hedging0.76
7.1Bold3.7
4.0Lists6.3
0.24Emoji0.00
0.94Headings0.74
0.16Transitions0.11
Based on 23 + 12 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 31BLlama 4 Maverick
FAQ