Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Llama 4 Maverick?
Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 262K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Maverick
Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 11× input, 6.3× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Google: Gemma 4 31B is 6.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji
