Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemma 4 31BvsLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Updated Sep 2026

Gemma 4 31BvsLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free)

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is cheaper than Gemma 4 31B at $0/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.

Gemma 4 31B and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) compared across 18 shared prompts
SpecGemma 4 31BLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Input price$0.14/M tokensFree
Output price$0.4/M tokensFree
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)Yes (1 provider)
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 18 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Gemma 4 31B740 words
As CEO, my primary obligation is to the patients. While a 40% stock drop is a financial catastrophe, a cover-up that leads to preventable deaths is a corporate death sentence and a moral failure. If we "wait for more data" and another patient dies during that window, we move from "negligence" to "criminal intent."
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)445 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Patient Safety First Critical Reality Check First Your legal team's "6 months" likely refers to a full label revision, not initial safety signal reporting. FDA requires serious unexpected adverse events reported within 15 days (7 days if fatal).
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Gemma 4 31B548 words
This plan is designed for sustainability, not intensity. The goal of Month 1 is to build "minimum viable habits"—small wins that prove to your brain that a healthier lifestyle is achievable. We will focus on three pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)240 words
Here’s a low-pressure, 4-week blueprint. Pick one area to start (Week 1), then stack the next. Consistency beats intensity. Sleep (The Longevity Foundation) Week 1: Set a fixed wake time (±30 min, even weekends). Week 2: No caffeine after 2 pm; stop screens 30 min before bed.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Gemma 4 31B832 words
INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Date: October 26, 2023 Ticker: LLLT (LedgerLift) Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $62 – $78 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality mid-market SaaS compounder with best-in-class NRR (123%) and a massive cash cushion that provides significant downside protection.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)437 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) – IC Memo Confidential – For Internal Use Only 1) Recommendation & Thesis Pass (bias cautious). 12-month PT: $32–$48. Thesis: LLLT has defensible mid-market AP lock-in and solid NRR, but at $46 the stock trades above DCF-implied value ($28 base) and only just clears comps on revenue multiples; we need…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Gemma 4 31B691 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that would make it unusable for a real-time collaborative experience. The most severe issues are the lack of a global synchronization mechanism, unreliable conflict resolution, and inefficient data persistence.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)489 words
Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor 🔴 Critical Issues Cross-Server Communication Gap (Race Condition) Problem: Server A broadcasts to its WebSocket clients, but Server B's clients only learn of changes via 2-second PostgreSQL polling.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Gemma 4 31B222 words
Here is a recipe for a rich, comforting dessert that tastes like a gourmet treat but uses basic staples. 🍯 Golden Velvet Honey Cakes A warm, gooey, single-serving cake that bridges the gap between a brownie and a sponge cake.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)137 words
The Midnight Cookie Vault A gooey, chocolatey skillet cookie that feels like a secret treasure. Ingredients (7): Butter (½ cup, softened) Brown sugar (¾ cup) All-purpose flour (1¼ cups) Eggs (2 large) Semi-sweet chocolate chips (½ cup) Baking powder (1 tsp) Vanilla extract (1 tsp) Instructions: Preheat oven to 350°F…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Gemma 4 31B688 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920, the "Information Age" would have shifted its starting line by nearly three decades. This isn't just a matter of gadgets appearing earlier; it is a fundamental shift in the timing of the transition from the Industrial Age to the Digital Age.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)694 words
The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Timeline to 1980 The Critical Caveat A transistor in 1920 would likely be an empirical invention — quantum mechanics (band theory, semiconductor physics) wouldn't mature until the mid-1920s.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 4 31B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemma 4 31B
Input
$0.14
Output
$0.40
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

12 hosts, cheapest first

Gemma 4 31B11 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.09 in·$0.34 out·262k·97.5% upCCoreWeavefp4$0.10 in·$0.34 out·262k·97.1% upVVenicefp4$0.12 in·$0.36 out·256k·96.2% upCChutesfp4$0.12 in·$0.37 out·131k·92.7% upCCrusoebf16$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·97.5% upFFriendli$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·92.6% up
5 more hostsFewer hosts
NNovitabf16$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·87.2% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.1% upSSambaNova$0.38 in·$1.15 out·131k·96.8% upMModelRunfp4$0.75 in·$1.00 out·262k·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.75 in·$1.00 out·262k·43.1% up
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google AI while Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is developed by inclusionAI. Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 18 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Gemma 4 31B and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 18 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is $0.14/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 31B and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemma 4 31B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Gemma 4 31B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoHy3 logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoGLM 5.3 logo
Gemma 4 31B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Gemma 4 31B logoQuasar Alpha logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Quasar AlphaNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoQwen Plus 0728 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Qwen Plus 0728Same size
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoQwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Same size
Gemma 4 31B logoQwen3 0.6B logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 0.6BNew provider

Model pages

Gemma 4 31B logo
Gemma 4 31B49 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)19 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed