Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Google: Gemma 4 31B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $1/M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Context windows: 262K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is from xiaomi. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to MiMo-V2.5-Pro's 1049K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $1/M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 7.1× input, 7.5× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Google: Gemma 4 31B is 7.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 6.6x more transitions
