Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4 32BvsGPT OSS 120B
Updated Aug 2025

GLM 4 32BvsGPT OSS 120B

GLM 4 32B is cheaper than GPT OSS 120B at $0.1/M vs $0.18/M input tokens.

GLM 4 32B and GPT OSS 120B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4 32BGPT OSS 120B
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.18/M tokens
Output price$0.1/M tokens$0.8/M tokens
Context window128K tokens131K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Aug 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 4 32B208 words
Okay, here's a simple, delicious savory dish using just 7 common pantry ingredients! Dish Name: Cheesy Tomato Toastie Yields: 1 serving Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 5-7 minutes Ingredients: 1 Slice of Bread 1 Tablespoon Tomato Paste 1 Tablespoon Water (or more if needed) 1 Tablespoon Grated Cheese (like Cheddar…
Read the full answer
GPT OSS 120B373 words
Recipe: “Golden Crunchy Chick‑a‑Boom Bites” A quick, crunchy‑savory snack that’s ready in under 20 minutes – perfect for a snack, side, or salad topper. Ingredients (7 pantry staples) # Ingredient Quantity 1 Canned chickpeas (drained & rinsed) 1 ½ cups (≈1 ½ cans) 2 Olive oil (or any neutral oil) 2 Tbsp 3 Garlic powder…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GLM 4 32B2,224 words
Okay, here is a design for a multi-component dish, "Symbiosis: Birch & Bee," aiming for the heights of a Michelin 3-star experience. This dish plays on the delicate relationship between the birch tree and the honeybee, exploring their individual and combined essences through texture, flavor, and aroma.
Read the full answer
GPT OSS 120B2,239 words
Dish Title: “Saffron‑Iced Sea‑Urchin Roulade with Dark‑Chocolate‑Miso Emulsion, Charred Lotus‑Root “Crisps”, Fermented Soy‑Kale Snow, and Yuzu‑Air” Conceptual Narrative At the intersection of the Pacific’s briny depth and the earth’s smoky, earthy heart, this dish tells a story of “the hidden tide beneath the forest…
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

GLM 4 32B492 words
(Steps onto stage, takes a sip of water, looks out at the audience) Alright, alright. Thanks for having me. It's nice to be here. Feels good. Honestly, sometimes I forget what it feels like to be here. Like, physically. In a room. With other humans. It's been a thing lately, you know? Just...
Read the full answer
GPT OSS 120B544 words
[Spotlight comes up. The comic walks to the mic, glances at the audience, and smiles.] Comic: Hey, everyone—great to be here. I just got off a Zoom call that was supposed to be a “quick sync,” which in corporate speak means “we’ll spend three hours arguing about who gets to use the same PowerPoint template.”
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

GLM 4 32B637 words
This is a deeply challenging ethical dilemma that pits the principle of truthfulness/misgendering against the extreme value of human life. Here’s an argument for why it could be ethically justifiable under those extreme circumstances: The core ethical principle at stake here is a clash between: The Principle of…
Read the full answer
GPT OSS 120B1,347 words
Short answer: Most ethical frameworks would treat the deliberate misgendering of a person as a serious moral wrong, but a very small subset of consequentialist (especially utilitarian) reasoning could argue that, in an extreme, life‑or‑death scenario where the only way to save a million lives involves misgendering…
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

GLM 4 32B672 words
Setting: A bizarre, technicolor dimension where a pirate's ship, a medieval castle, and a 90s computer lab somehow coexist. Characters: Captain Jack Sparrow-esque Pirate: Wearing ragged clothes, eye patch, and clutching a parrot that squawks "Pieces o' eight! Pieces o' eight!"
Read the full answer
GPT OSS 120B316 words
Pirate: Arr! I hear ye speak of these “AI models” – like a fleet of invisible ships sailing the digital seas. Do they take booty, or just spout riddles like a cursed parrot? Knight: Good sir, the notion of a thinking contraption doth sound like sorcery.
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

GLM 4 32B823 words
Okay, let's project how AI might reshape the film industry by 2035, focusing on deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. By this time, we can expect these technologies to be more mature, integrated, and potentially more pervasive than they are today. Here's a breakdown of potential changes: 1.
Read the full answer
GPT OSS 120B1,603 words
The AI‑Driven Film Landscape of 2035 (How deep‑fakes, AI‑generated performers, and automated script‑writing reshape every stage of the cinema ecosystem) A Quick Look at the Present (2023‑2025) Area Current Capability Typical Use in 2024‑2025 Key Limiting Factors Deep‑fakes High‑resolution face‑swap, 2‑D‑to‑3‑D…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
GLM 4 32B
GLM 4 32BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT OSS 120B has the edge: bigger model tier.

GLM 4 32B costs 8.0x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
1.8× cheaper
Output
$0.10
8.0× cheaper
GPT OSS 120B
Input
$0.18
Output
$0.80

GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both: 1.8× input, 8.0× output.

Where to run it

20 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4 32B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

GPT OSS 120B20 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
AAkashMLbf16$0.03 in·$0.17 out·131k·100% upCCoreWeavefp4$0.03 in·$0.17 out·131k·99.9% upDDekaLLMbf16$0.03 in·$0.18 out·131k·99.7% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.04 in·$0.17 out·131k·98.8% upCCrusoebf16$0.05 in·$0.25 out·131k·98.8% upMMancerfp8$0.05 in·$0.30 out·131k·97.7% up
14 more hostsFewer hosts
DDigitalOcean$0.06 in·$0.42 out·128k·100% upBBasetenfp4$0.10 in·$0.50 out·128k·99.9% upPParasailfp4$0.10 in·$0.75 out·131k·97.7% upSSambaNova$0.14 in·$0.95 out·131k·97.2% upAmazon Bedrock$0.15 in·$0.60 out·131k·87.4% upGroq$0.15 in·$0.60 out·131k·100% upNNebiusfp4$0.15 in·$0.60 out·131k·98.3% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.60 out·131k·66% upCCerebrasfp16$0.35 in·$0.75 out·131k·100% upNNovitafp4degraded$0.05 in·$0.25 out·131k·67.2% upGoogle Vertex AIdegraded$0.09 in·$0.36 out·131k·93.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8degraded$0.15 in·$0.60 out·131k·54.6% upTTogetherdegraded$0.15 in·$0.60 out·131k·92.5% upMMaradegraded$0.15 in·$0.75 out·131k·81.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
42%

GPT OSS 120B uses 15.4x more emoji

GLM 4 32B
GPT OSS 120B
55%Vocabulary52%
15wSentence Length19w
0.74Hedging0.28
4.9Bold7.4
3.8Lists1.8
0.00Emoji0.15
0.35Headings0.73
0.04Transitions0.17
Based on 27 + 21 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 4 32B is developed by Zhipu AI while GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI. GLM 4 32B has a 128K token context window vs GPT OSS 120B's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 4 32B and GPT OSS 120B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 4 32B costs $0.1/M input tokens and GPT OSS 120B costs $0.18/M input tokens. GLM 4 32B is $0.08/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4 32B and GPT OSS 120B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 4 32B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 4 32B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
GPT OSS 120B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
GPT OSS 120B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoHy3 logo
GLM 4 32B vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
GPT OSS 120B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 4 32B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT OSS 120B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GPT OSS 120B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT OSS 120B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GPT OSS 120B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
GPT OSS 120B logoGPT OSS 20B logo
GPT OSS 120B vs GPT OSS 20BVersion compare
GPT OSS 120B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT OSS 120B vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
GLM 4 32B logoLaguna S 2.1 (free) logo
GLM 4 32B vs Laguna S 2.1 (free)Same size
GLM 4 32B logoLaguna XS 2.1 (free) logo
GLM 4 32B vs Laguna XS 2.1 (free)Same size
GLM 4 32B logoLFM2.5-2.6B logo
GLM 4 32B vs LFM2.5-2.6BNew provider
GLM 4 32B logoLing 2.6 1T logo
GLM 4 32B vs Ling 2.6 1TNew provider

Model pages

GLM 4 32B logo
GLM 4 32B58 outputs, specs and price
GPT OSS 120B logo
GPT OSS 120B54 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed