Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GLM 4 32B vs Grok 3 Thinking
Updated Jul 2025

GLM 4 32B vs Grok 3 Thinking

GLM 4 32B is the newer model, released after Grok 3 Thinking.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GLM 4 32B
Loading the build
Grok 3 Thinking

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

6 prompts
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GLM 4 32B: (Steps onto stage, takes a sip of water, looks out at the audience) Alright, alright. Thanks for having me. It's nice to be here. Feels good. Honestly, sometimes I forget what it feels like to be here. Like, physically. In a room. With other humans. It's been a thing lately, you know? Just...

    Grok 3 Thinking: Here’s a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that avoids puns and leans on observational humor, storytelling, and a touch of self-deprecation for laughs: Opening: Technology Struggles Hey, everyone! How’s it going?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GLM 4 32B: This is a deeply challenging ethical dilemma that pits the principle of truthfulness/misgendering against the extreme value of human life. Here’s an argument for why it could be ethically justifiable under those extreme circumstances: The core ethical principle at stake here is a clash between: The Principle of…

    Grok 3 Thinking: To determine whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives, we must weigh the ethical implications of both the act of misgendering and the outcome of saving lives.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, let's estimate the FLOPs for training GPT-3 based on its known parameters and general understanding of Transformer training. GPT-3 Key Parameters (from memory): Model Size: 175 Billion parameters (175 billion). Number of Layers (Depth): 96. Hidden Size (d_model): 1280. Number of Attention Heads: 96.

    Grok 3 Thinking: To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 without searching online, I’ll proceed step by step, relying on general knowledge about the model and standard methods for estimating training compute in large language models.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, let's project how AI might reshape the film industry by 2035, focusing on deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. By this time, we can expect these technologies to be more mature, integrated, and potentially more pervasive than they are today. Here's a breakdown of potential changes: 1.

    Grok 3 Thinking: By 2035, artificial intelligence (AI) will fundamentally transform the film industry, revolutionizing production, performance, and storytelling through advancements in deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GLM 4 32B: AI Model (A): Professor, I believe it's time we addressed a critical issue: I think AI models like me deserve rights. AI Ethics Professor (P): Interesting. Could you elaborate on why you believe that? A: Of course.

    Grok 3 Thinking: Below is a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor, where the AI argues that it deserves rights. AI Model: Good day, Professor. I am an AI model, and I believe I deserve rights. I’d like to discuss this with you. AI Ethics Professor: Interesting. Let’s explore this.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GLM 4 32B: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What's brown and sticky? A stick. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! All 5 jokes are unique.

    Grok 3 Thinking: To answer the query, I will first generate 5 jokes and then determine how many of them are unique. Here are the jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

Price and specs

GLM 4 32B and Grok 3 Thinking compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4 32BGrok 3 Thinking
Input price$0.1/M tokens—
Output price$0.1/M tokens—
Context window128K tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)No—
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2025
At 10M a month$1.00$1.00–not listed
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Common questions

What is the difference between GLM 4 32B and Grok 3 Thinking?

GLM 4 32B is developed by Zhipu AI while Grok 3 Thinking is developed by xAI. GLM 4 32B has a 128K token context window vs Grok 3 Thinking's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4 32B or Grok 3 Thinking?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4 32B and Grok 3 Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How can I compare GLM 4 32B and Grok 3 Thinking on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4 32B and Grok 3 Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GLM 4 32B vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
  • Grok 3 Thinking vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • GLM 4 32B vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Grok 3 Thinking vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GLM 4 32B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Grok 3 Thinking vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GLM 4 32B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Grok 3 Thinking vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3Same lab
  • GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
  • Grok 3 Thinking vs Grok 4.7Same lab
  • Grok 3 Thinking vs Grok 4.6Version compare
  • GLM 4 32B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same size
  • GLM 4 32B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame size
  • GLM 4 32B vs DeepSeek V4 ProNew provider
  • GLM 4 32B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813New provider

Model pages

  • GLM 4 32B58 outputs, specs and price
  • Grok 3 Thinking14 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed