Grok 3 Thinking by xAI — Pricing, Benchmarks & Real Outputs
Share
Loading...
Compare Grok 3 Thinking
Alternatives to Grok 3 Thinking
Grok 3 Thinking is good. These would like a word anyway.
Grok 3 Thinking is good. These would like a word anyway.
Grok 3 Thinking is good. These would like a word anyway.
Grok 3 Thinking exposes the full chain-of-thought process during problem-solving, including error backtracking and alternative solution exploration. Scores 84.6% on GPQA Diamond benchmark for expert-level Q&A.
The student who writes "below is my answer" before every answer and then explains what they just explained. Treats every prompt like a take-home exam that might be graded.
Its sentience test was the most surface-level in the batch, with the AI character making generic claims about self-awareness. Generated five jokes then individually explained why each one was unique, which is the comedy equivalent of explaining a magic trick mid-performance.
Taste is judged on an uncapped scale, originality first. The space past 100 is craft today's models rarely reach.
Unique words vs. total words. Higher = richer vocabulary.
Average words per sentence.
"Might", "perhaps", "arguably" per 100 words.
**Bold** markers per 1,000 characters.
Bullet and numbered list items per 1,000 characters.
Markdown headings per 1,000 characters.
Emoji per 1,000 characters.
"However", "moreover", "furthermore" per 100 words.
14 outputs · generated before accounting joined the chat
Grok 3 Thinking exposes the full chain-of-thought process during problem-solving, including error backtracking and alternative solution exploration. Scores 84.6% on GPQA Diamond benchmark for expert-level Q&A.
The student who writes "below is my answer" before every answer and then explains what they just explained. Treats every prompt like a take-home exam that might be graded.
Its sentience test was the most surface-level in the batch, with the AI character making generic claims about self-awareness. Generated five jokes then individually explained why each one was unique, which is the comedy equivalent of explaining a magic trick mid-performance.
Taste is judged on an uncapped scale, originality first. The space past 100 is craft today's models rarely reach.
Unique words vs. total words. Higher = richer vocabulary.
Average words per sentence.
"Might", "perhaps", "arguably" per 100 words.
**Bold** markers per 1,000 characters.
Bullet and numbered list items per 1,000 characters.
Markdown headings per 1,000 characters.
Emoji per 1,000 characters.
"However", "moreover", "furthermore" per 100 words.
14 outputs · generated before accounting joined the chat
