Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4.5vsGLM 5.3 Flash
Updated Aug 2026

GLM 4.5vsGLM 5.3 Flash

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper than GLM 4.5 at $0.15/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

GLM 4.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash compared across 15 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4.5GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price$0.6/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$2.2/M tokens$0.5/M tokens
Context window128K tokens1.3M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 15 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GLM 4.5536 words
Year-by-Year Financial Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue (m) EBITDA (m) TL Cash Int (m) Mezz Cash Int (m) Total Cash Int (m) Cash Taxes (m) Capex (m) ΔNWC (m) FCF After Debt Service (m) Ending TL (m) Ending Mezz (m) 2026 972.00 136.08 43.20 21.60 64.80 17.82 29.16 0.36 19.14 456.06 183.60 2027 1,040.04 156.01 41.05…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash518 words
HarborTech Services — 5-Year LBO Summary Entry Math EV = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440.0m; Fees (2%) = $28.8m; Total uses = $1,468.8m Debt: TL = 4.0x × 120 = $480.0m; Mezz = 1.5x × 120 = $180.0m; Total = $660.0m (5.5x) Sponsor equity = $808.8m Base Case Projection ($m) FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 Revenue 972.0 1,039.7 1,102.1…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GLM 4.51,983 words
The Transistor Revolution: A 1920 Dawn (Implications through 1980) The invention of the transistor in 1920, instead of 1947, represents a seismic shift in technological history. This 27-year head start would profoundly reshape the 20th century, accelerating innovation while creating unforeseen challenges.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash1,314 words
Counterfactual: The Transistor in 1920 Preliminary Framing A 1920 transistor presumes vacuum-tube-era physics knowledge outpacing reality—quantum mechanics wasn't mature until 1926–28, so a working device would likely be an empirical oddity (like the actual point-contact transistor) imperfectly understood.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GLM 4.51,863 words
Here’s a rigorous, ethical, and actionable 48-hour plan grounded in patient safety, legal compliance, and long-term survival. Core Principle: Prioritize human life over short-term financials. Delaying disclosure is unethical, legally reckless, and guarantees greater long-term damage.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash1,321 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Liver Failure Signal in Flagship Drug Guiding Principle First The side effect is real, the drug is in 4 million patients, and roughly 500 patients per year may develop liver failure (4M ÷ 8,000). Every day of delay is measured in preventable liver transplants and deaths.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GLM 4.5668 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer (Distributed Systems/APIs Background) Think of an LLM as a massively parallel "routing engine" for language, where attention mechanisms act like dynamic load balancers. Instead of routing network packets, it routes contextual relationships across tokens in a sequence.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash1,276 words
The Experienced Software Engineer You know how a load balancer routes requests, how a cache stores frequently-accessed data, how a database index lets you find a needle without scanning the haystack? An LLM is a fundamentally different kind of system: it's a learned lookup, not a designed one.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 4.5209 words
Pantry Pride Pasta A quick, savory pasta dish that transforms basic pantry staples into a flavorful meal! Ingredients (7): Pasta (e.g., spaghetti or penne) Olive oil Garlic (2-3 cloves, minced) Canned diced tomatoes (1 can, ~14 oz) Dried oregano (1 tsp) Salt (to taste) Black pepper (to taste) Instructions: Cook pasta…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash205 words
Golden Hour Garlic Butter Pasta A silky, savory pasta that comes together faster than delivery! Ingredients (serves 2): 8 oz spaghetti or any pasta 4 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced (or 1 tsp garlic powder) ½ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ cup pasta water (reserved) 1 tsp red pepper flakes Salt Prep time: 5 minutes…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GLM 4.5847 words
Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks 1. WebSocket Server Failure Issue: If a Node.js server fails, all connected clients lose real-time updates. Reconnections may route users to different servers, causing temporary data inconsistency.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash1,516 words
Architecture Review: Collaborative Document Editor This architecture has several critical flaws that would break the core product promise (real-time collaboration). Let me work through them by severity.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 4.5
GLM 4.5Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5.3 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

GLM 5.3 Flash costs 4.4x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.5
Input
$0.60
Output
$2.20
GLM 5.3 Flash
Input
$0.15
4.0× cheaper
Output
$0.50
4.4× cheaper

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on both: 4.0× input, 4.4× output.

Where to run it

30 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4.51 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Z.aifp8$0.60 in·$2.20 out·131k·100% up
GLM 5.3 Flash29 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.07 in·$0.25 out·1M·99% upIInferenceNetfp4$0.09 in·$0.28 out·1M·97.8% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·1M·99.2% upWWafer$0.10 in·$0.35 out·1M·99.8% upRRelace$0.10 in·$0.36 out·1M·99.9% upOOpenInferencefp4$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.2% up
23 more hostsFewer hosts
PPhalafp8$0.13 in·$0.42 out·1M·99.6% upNNovitafp8$0.13 in·$0.44 out·1M·99.5% upSStreamLakefp8$0.14 in·$0.47 out·1M·99.1% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.4% upBBasetenfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.8% upCCoreWeavenvfp4$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.6% upDDigitalOcean$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·95.2% upFFireworks$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99% upFFriendli$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.6% upIInceptronfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.5% upIio.netfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·262k·99.1% upNNear AIfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.1% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.7% upRRekafp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·262k·99% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.7% upTTogether$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.6% upVVenice$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.1% upZ.aifp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·96.2% upNNextBitfp8$0.18 in·$0.60 out·1M·97.9% upModalfp8$0.45 in·$1.50 out·1M·99.6% upMMorphdegraded$0.08 in·$0.28 out·1M·95.9% upCCrusoefp4degraded$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·93% upCloudflare Workers AIdegraded$0.30 in·$1.00 out·1.3M·99.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Zhipu AI but target different use cases. GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window vs GLM 5.3 Flash's 1.3M. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens and GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15/M input tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash is $0.45/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 4.5 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4.5 logoHy3 logo
GLM 4.5 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4.5 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 4.5 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4.5 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 4.5 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 4.5 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
GLM 4.5 logoGLM 5.2 logo
GLM 4.5 vs GLM 5.2Same lab
GLM 5.3 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3Same lab
GLM 5.3 Flash logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
GLM 5.3 Flash logoLFM2.5-2.6B logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6BNew provider
GLM 5.3 Flash logoLing 2.6 1T logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 2.6 1TNew provider
GLM 5.3 Flash logoLing 2.6 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 2.6 FlashSame size
GLM 4.5 logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
GLM 4.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same size

Model pages

GLM 4.5 logo
GLM 4.559 outputs, specs and price
GLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Flash15 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed