Z.AI: GLM 4.5 vs GPT OSS 120B
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 by Zhipu AI against GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI, in 33 community votes, z.ai: glm 4.5 wins 71% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 131K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 or GPT OSS 120B?
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is the better choice overall, winning 71% of 33 blind community votes on Rival. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $0.18/M for GPT OSS 120B. Context windows: 128K vs 131K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and GPT OSS 120B
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is made by zhipu while GPT OSS 120B is from openai. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $0.18/M for GPT OSS 120B. In community voting, In 33 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 71% of head-to-head duels.
In 33 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 71% of head-to-head duels. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 leads in Image Generation, Web Design, while GPT OSS 120B leads in Reasoning. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 33+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5. In 33 blind votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 71% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5 for Image Generation, Web Design. Pick GPT OSS 120B for Reasoning.
Style Comparison
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 uses 2.7x more lists
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.



