Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4.6vsNex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Updated Sep 2026

GLM 4.6vsNex-N2.5-Pro (free)

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is cheaper than GLM 4.6 at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

GLM 4.6 and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4.6Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Input price$0.4/M tokensFree
Output price$1.75/M tokensFree
Context window203K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedSep 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GLM 4.61,480 words
Michelin 3-Star Dish: "Tidal Echo" Conceptual Narrative "Tidal Echo" is a poetic interpretation of the moment a wave recedes from a remote, mineral-rich shore at dusk. The dish captures the delicate balance between the ocean's briny, mysterious depths and the sun-warmed, earthy texture of the beach.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1,665 words
Dish: “Tidewater Orchard” Langoustine · Mirabelle Plum · Juniper · Kombu · Rye A tasting-menu course built around an unusual pairing: sweet cold-water langoustine with mirabelle plum, bridged by kombu umami, juniper resin, green tomato acidity, and toasted rye bitterness.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 4.6288 words
Of course! Here is a simple and delicious recipe for a chewy, comforting sweet treat that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Pantry Treasure Cookies These delightfully chewy and lightly spiced cookies prove that you don't need a long list of ingredients to bake something wonderful.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)119 words
Pantry Moon Bars A sweet, chewy peanut butter–chocolate oat treat made with only 7 pantry staples. Ingredients Rolled oats Creamy peanut butter Honey Chocolate chips Vanilla extract Ground cinnamon Salt Instructions Heat oven to 350°F / 175°C. Line an 8-inch square pan with parchment paper.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GLM 4.61,669 words
Of course. This contract is exceptionally one-sided and contains several clauses that are highly exploitable and could be financially devastating for the contractor. Here is a clause-by-clause analysis of the problems, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,451 words
Below is a general contract-risk review, not legal advice. Enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction, contractor classification, and the exact facts. Also, even if a clause might be unenforceable, relying on that is risky because litigation/arbitration is expensive.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GLM 4.61,502 words
This is a defining moment. The decision made in the next 48 hours will determine not only the company's financial future but its soul. My guiding principle is simple: We will control the narrative by doing the right thing, immediately.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,359 words
As CEO, I would not wait six months and I would not let the board delay disclosure while patients remain exposed to an unreported serious risk. I would treat this as a patient-safety, regulatory, legal, and trust crisis—not merely a financial-risk issue. My guiding decisions would be: Patient safety comes first.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GLM 4.61,573 words
This is a fascinating and complex scenario. The invention of the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would represent one of the most significant "what-ifs" in modern history, creating a cascade of accelerating changes. Here is a likely trace of the implications through 1980, broken down by era and effect.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,726 words
Starting assumption Assume the 1920 “transistor” is a usable but crude solid-state amplifier/switch: reproducible enough for telecom and radio, but noisy, low-power, temperature-sensitive, and expensive at first.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GLM 4.61,779 words
This is an excellent and classic architecture for a real-time system that contains several critical flaws. Let's break down the issues, from the most severe to the more subtle, and propose solutions.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)3,042 words
Executive summary The biggest correctness risks are: Client-clock last-write-wins is unsafe: clock skew, malicious clients, ties, and out-of-order delivery can silently lose edits.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 4.6
GLM 4.6
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.6
Input
$0.40
Output
$1.75
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

5 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4.64 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
VVenicefp4$0.43 in·$1.75 out·198k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.50 in·$2.00 out·203k·99.6% upNNovitabf16$0.55 in·$2.20 out·205k·98.8% upZ.aifp4$0.60 in·$2.20 out·203k·99.7% up
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNex AGIfp8degraded$0 in·$0 out·262k·99.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 4.6 is developed by Zhipu AI while Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is developed by Nex AGI. GLM 4.6 has a 203K token context window vs Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.6 and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.6 and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 4.6 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4.6 logoHy3 logo
GLM 4.6 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4.6 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 4.6 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4.6 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 4.6 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 4.6 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoNex-N2.5-Mini (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGPT OSS 20B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs GPT OSS 20BSame size
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Granite 4.2 8BNew provider
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGrok 3 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Grok 3New provider
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGrok 3 Beta logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Grok 3 BetaNew provider

Model pages

GLM 4.6 logo
GLM 4.659 outputs, specs and price
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)14 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed