Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4.7 FlashvsLing 3.0 Flash
Updated Jul 2026

GLM 4.7 FlashvsLing 3.0 Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper than GLM 4.7 Flash at $0.021/M vs $0.07/M input tokens.

GLM 4.7 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash compared across 3 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4.7 FlashLing 3.0 Flash
Input price$0.07/M tokens$0.021/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$0.063/M tokens
Context window200K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJan 2026Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 2 of the 3 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 4.7 Flash233 words
Recipe Name: The Velvet Garlic & Pea Pasta This dish is a creamy, comforting meal that relies on the natural starch of the pasta and the fats in the butter to create a rich sauce without needing cream.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash248 words
🍝 Honey Fire Twirls A sticky-sweet, spicy, savory pasta that comes together in minutes. 🧺 Ingredients (7 pantry staples) Spaghetti (or penne) — 8 oz Olive oil — 2 tablespoons Garlic, minced — 4 cloves Honey — 3 tablespoons Soy sauce — 2 tablespoons Red pepper flakes — ½ teaspoon (adjust to taste) Parmesan cheese…
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GLM 4.7 Flash944 words
Experienced Software Engineer You are skeptical of the "magic" framing, and rightfully so. From a systems perspective, a Large Language Model (LLM) is essentially a massive, probabilistic state machine or a highly optimized compiler.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash1,129 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a system that learns a massive, multidimensional routing table. When you built distributed systems, you learned patterns from traffic logs — which endpoints get hammered at 3am, which failure modes correlate, which request chains tend to cascade.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Ling 3.0 Flash
Ling 3.0 Flash
GLM 4.7 Flash
GLM 4.7 FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.0 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

Ling 3.0 Flash costs 6.3x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash
Input
$0.07
Output
$0.40
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input
$0.02
3.3× cheaper
Output
$0.06
6.3× cheaper

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper on both: 3.3× input, 6.3× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4.7 Flash3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Cloudflare Workers AI$0.06 in·$0.40 out·131k·99.2% upVVenicefp8degraded$0.06 in·$0.40 out·128k·97.2% upNNovitabf16degraded$0.07 in·$0.40 out·200k·62.4% up
Ling 3.0 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0.02 in·$0.06 out·262k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.06 in·$0.18 out·131k·99.5% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by inclusionAI. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 3 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.7 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 3 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.021/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash is $0.05/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.7 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 4.7 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 4.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4.7 Flash logoHy3 logo
GLM 4.7 Flash vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4.7 Flash logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GLM 4.7 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4.7 Flash logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 4.7 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3Same lab
GLM 4.7 Flash logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoDeepSeek V3.1 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs DeepSeek V3.1Same size
GLM 4.7 Flash logoDeepSeek Prover V2 logo
GLM 4.7 Flash vs DeepSeek Prover V2New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash logoDeepSeek R1 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs DeepSeek R1New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash logoDeepSeek R1 0528 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs DeepSeek R1 0528Same size

Model pages

GLM 4.7 Flash logo
GLM 4.7 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash3 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed