What is the difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3 Coder Flash is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3 Coder Flash's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost compared to Qwen3 Coder Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.3/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.23/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3 Coder Flash is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3 Coder Flash's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost compared to Qwen3 Coder Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.3/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.23/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jan 2026

GLM 4.7 FlashvsQwen3 Coder Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash at $0.07/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.7 Flash	Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input price	$0.07/M tokens	$0.3/M tokens
Output price	$0.4/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	128K tokens
Released	Jan 2026	Sep 2025
SWE-bench Verified	59.2%	50.3%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.7 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for Web Design. Pick Qwen3 Coder Flash for Reasoning. GLM 4.7 Flash costs 3.8x less per token.

Too close to call

What do GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

4.3× cheaper

Output

$0.40

3.8× cheaper

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Input

$0.30

Output

$1.50

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 4.3× input, 3.8× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

51%

Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 6.2x more sentence length

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 Coder Flash

52%Vocabulary60%

15wSentence Length92w

0.33Hedging0.60

5.8Bold6.1

4.7Lists6.2

0.00Emoji0.00

0.68Headings1.64

0.13Transitions0.18

Based on 19 + 22 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MercuryNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4 Fast (free)New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4.1 FastNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4.20 BetaNew provider

Updated Jan 2026

GLM 4.7 FlashvsQwen3 Coder Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash at $0.07/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.7 Flash	Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input price	$0.07/M tokens	$0.3/M tokens
Output price	$0.4/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	128K tokens
Released	Jan 2026	Sep 2025
SWE-bench Verified	59.2%	50.3%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.7 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for Web Design. Pick Qwen3 Coder Flash for Reasoning. GLM 4.7 Flash costs 3.8x less per token.

Too close to call

What do GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Flash say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

4.3× cheaper

Output

$0.40

3.8× cheaper

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Input

$0.30

Output

$1.50

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 4.3× input, 3.8× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

51%

Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 6.2x more sentence length

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 Coder Flash

52%Vocabulary60%

15wSentence Length92w

0.33Hedging0.60

5.8Bold6.1

4.7Lists6.2

0.00Emoji0.00

0.68Headings1.64

0.13Transitions0.18

Based on 19 + 22 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MercuryNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4 Fast (free)New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4.1 FastNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4.20 BetaNew provider