Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4.7vsQwen3.6 27B
Updated Apr 2026

GLM 4.7vsQwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B is the newer model, released after GLM 4.7.

GLM 4.7 and Qwen3.6 27B compared across 50 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4.7Qwen3.6 27B
Input price—$0.325/M tokens
Output price—$3.25/M tokens
Context window—256K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2026
Our Verdict
GLM 4.7
GLM 4.7
Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7
Input
—
Output
—
Qwen3.6 27B
Input
$0.33
Output
$3.25
Where to run it

13 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4.77 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovitafp8$0.54 in·$1.98 out·205k·94.5% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.60 in·$2.20 out·200k·100% upDDeepInfrafp4degraded$0.40 in·$1.75 out·203k·95.8% upAAtlasCloudfp8degraded$0.52 in·$1.85 out·203k·92.3% upVVenicefp4degraded$0.55 in·$2.65 out·198k·90.3% upZ.aifp4degraded$0.60 in·$2.20 out·203k·78.3% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
MMancerfp4degraded$0.70 in·$2.50 out·131k·88.9% up
Qwen3.6 27B6 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
CChutesfp8$0.30 in·$2.00 out·262k·97.7% upVVenicefp8$0.33 in·$3.25 out·256k·98.6% upAlibaba Cloud$0.45 in·$2.70 out·262k·99.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8degraded$0.30 in·$3.20 out·262k·76.9% upPPhaladegraded$0.32 in·$2.70 out·262k·79.7% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.32 in·$3.20 out·262k·91.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
37%

Qwen3.6 27B uses 13.9x more emoji

GLM 4.7
Qwen3.6 27B
54%Vocabulary62%
16wSentence Length16w
0.26Hedging0.28
5.4Bold4.3
3.9Lists2.1
0.11Emoji1.54
0.48Headings0.68
0.07Transitions0.05
Based on 23 + 25 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 logoMiniMax M3 logo
GLM 4.7 vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 4.7 logoOx Alpha logo
GLM 4.7 vs Ox AlphaSame lab
GLM 4.7 logoGPT-5 logo
GLM 4.7 vs GPT-5New provider
GLM 4.7 logoClaude Sonnet 4 logo
GLM 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
GLM 4.7 logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
GLM 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
GLM 4.7 logoMistral Large logo
GLM 4.7 vs Mistral LargeNew provider
GLM 4.7 logoMistral Large 2 logo
GLM 4.7 vs Mistral Large 2New provider
GLM 4.7 logoMistral Large 3 2512 logo
GLM 4.7 vs Mistral Large 3 2512New provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed