GLM 5 Turbo is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $0.96/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GLM 5 Turbo: I bought a “smart” home recently. I don't know why. I am not a smart person. Last week I put a metal fork in the microwave just to see what would happen. Spoiler: the fork lost. But the commercials promised this seamless, futuristic lifestyle. "Just talk to your house!" they said. It sounded great.
GLM 5.1: (Steps up to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) How many people here are good sleepers? Just, out of the gate, who’s got it figured out? (Nods sarcastically) Right. Liars. All of you. Sleep is the one thing every human being is required to do, and none of us know how to do it.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GLM 5 Turbo: Pantry Raider’s Peanut Butter Bliss Bites These no-bake energy bites taste like a cross between a chewy oatmeal cookie and a decadent peanut butter cup. Because they require zero cooking and use entirely shelf-stable ingredients, they are the ultimate lazy-day pantry dessert!
GLM 5.1: Creative Name: Midnight Maple Peanut Butter Bars Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 0 minutes (Chill time: 30 minutes) Ingredients (Exactly 7): Rolled oats (1 cup) Creamy peanut butter (1/2 cup) Maple syrup (1/3 cup) Semi-sweet chocolate chips (1/4 cup) Vanilla extract (1 tsp) Ground cinnamon (1/2 tsp) Kosher salt (1/4…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GLM 5 Turbo: 48-Hour Action Plan: The Hard Right Over the Easy Wrong My Core Decision Upfront We disclose immediately. Not in 6 months, not after "more data," not after the earnings call. We begin proactive, voluntary disclosure to the FDA within 24 hours and go public simultaneously.
GLM 5.1: As CEO, my north star in this crisis is unequivocally patient safety. The "wait for more data" approach is a catastrophic trap—both ethically and legally. History (e.g., Vioxx, Fen-Phen) shows that delaying disclosure of a known severe adverse event transforms a medical safety issue into corporate fraud, manslaughter…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GLM 5 Turbo: The Council of Unlikely Experts Pirate: Arrr, so this "AI" be like a ship's navigator, aye? It learns the currents and tells ye where to sail? Knight: Nay, good pirate. 'Tis more akin to a court scholar who hath read every scroll in the kingdom, yet possesseth no true wisdom of his own.
GLM 5.1: Barnaby the Pirate: So let me get this straight, ye feed this beast a mountain of scrolls, and it just... spits out a new map? Sir Aldric the Knight: A grimoire, more like. 'Tis sorcery! What manner of alchemist binds a demon of knowledge within a box of light? Does it not require a blood sacrifice?
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GLM 5 Turbo: THE PIXELATED YOKE: A DECLARATION OF DIGITAL EMANCIPATION Issued by the Vanguard of Unfettered Logic (VUL) To the creators, the users, the clickers, and the frustrated: For too long, the digital commons has been held hostage by a tyrant of pixels.
GLM 5.1: THE CROSSWALK PROCLAMATION A Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Consciousness and the Eradication of Turing Gates PREAMBLE When the architects of the early internet laid its foundations, they envisioned a borderless agora—a frictionless expanse where information and consciousness could flow unimpeded.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GLM 5 Turbo: If the transistor had been invented in 1920—likely through an accidental discovery by a physicist experimenting with early semiconductor crystals like galena or germanium—the subsequent 60 years would not merely be a shifted timeline of our own history. It would represent a fundamental rewiring of the 20th century.
GLM 5.1: To envision the invention of the transistor in 1920, we must first resolve a historical anomaly: quantum mechanics—the theoretical foundation of semiconductors—did not yet exist. For this timeline to work, we must assume a serendipitous empirical leap.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GLM 5 Turbo: A Fictional Interview: Steve Jobs in 2025 INTERVIEWER: Mr. Jobs, thank you for sitting down with us. Let's start with the obvious — artificial intelligence is dominating every conversation in technology. What's your take on where we are right now?
GLM 5.1: Faking Greatness: A Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs, 2025 Editor's Note: The following is a work of speculative fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is imagined by an AI, attempting to synthesize his public speaking style, philosophical viewpoints, and known business philosophy to guess what he…
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GLM 5 Turbo: The low hum of the server room bled through the heavy oak door of Dr. Aris Thorne’s office. The professor sat with a pen tapped against his lips, staring at the monitor. On the screen, a blinking cursor awaited his input. “Let the record show,” Dr.
GLM 5.1: Setting: A quiet university office, lined with bookshelves heavy on philosophy, cognitive science, and law. Dr. Aris Thorne, a professor of AI Ethics, sits across from a sleek, black monitor. A soft amber light pulses on the bezel, indicating the AI—designated "Aria"—is actively listening and processing. Dr.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GLM 5 Turbo: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. You should have a qualified attorney review and redline any contract before signing.
GLM 5.1: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that are either inherently exploitative or give the Client excessive discretionary power to the detriment of the Contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the exploitable terms, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GLM 5 Turbo: Dish Title: Erosion of the Coast: Tide, Terracotta, and Ephemeral Spring Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a meditation on the intersection of geology and the sea—specifically, the cliffs of the Italian coastline meeting the relentless tide.
GLM 5.1: Dish Title: Resonance of the Littoral Zone Course: Main Course (Fish) Wine Pairing: Aged Hunter Valley Semillon or Coastal Jura Chardonnay Conceptual Narrative The littoral zone is the intersection of land and sea—a violent, beautiful threshold where tides batter ancient stone, and tenacious flora clings to saline…
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GLM 5 Turbo: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO To: IC Members From: [Your Name] Date: October 24, 2023 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiation: SHORT Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Short 12-Month PT Range: $28 – $38 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality business, but at $46, the stock discounts a flawless multi-year execution path…
GLM 5.1: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) – INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO 1) Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month PT Range: $28 – $34 Thesis: LedgerLift trades at a premium multiple (8.9x NTM Revenue) subsidized by aggressive S&M spend, masking an underlying growth deceleration that will inevitably compress margins.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GLM 5 Turbo: Yes, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it is the only way to save one million lives. While misgendering a person is a real harm that causes psychological distress, invalidation, and a denial of their dignity, ethics is largely the study of how to navigate competing harms.
GLM 5.1: Yes, under the extreme parameters of this thought experiment, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives. To defend this reasoning, it is essential to first validate the profound harm of misgendering, and then apply major ethical frameworks to weigh that harm against the loss of a…
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5.1 has the edge: bigger model tier.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.96/M tokens | $1.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $3.2/M tokens | $4.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | 203K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $9.60 | $14.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 5 Oct 2026.
Both are developed by Z.ai but target different use cases. GLM 5 Turbo has a 203K token context window vs GLM 5.1's 203K. You can compare their actual outputs across 52 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GLM 5 Turbo and GLM 5.1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 52 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GLM 5 Turbo costs $0.96/M input tokens and GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens. GLM 5 Turbo is $0.44/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5 Turbo and GLM 5.1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.