Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5 TurbovsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Updated Aug 2026

GLM 5 TurbovsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

GLM 5 Turbo is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $0.96/M vs $2/M input tokens.

GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5 TurboQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price$0.96/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$3.2/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window203K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Aug 2026
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
GLM 5 Turbo
GLM 5 TurboRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5 Turbo
Input
$0.96
2.1× cheaper
Output
$3.20
1.9× cheaper
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

GLM 5 Turbo is cheaper on both: 2.1× input, 1.9× output.

Where to run it

8 hosts

GLM 5 Turbo1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Z.ai$1.20 in·$4.00 out·203k·100% up
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% upDDeepInfrafp4$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·99.9% upModal$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% upNNovita$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% upTTogether$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.9% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
VVenice$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·98.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
45%

GLM 5 Turbo uses 3.6x more transitions

GLM 5 Turbo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
54%Vocabulary53%
18wSentence Length18w
0.24Hedging0.83
4.0Bold3.1
3.0Lists4.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.72Headings1.34
0.17Transitions0.05
Based on 23 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGPT-5 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoClaude Opus 4.1 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashNew provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashNew provider
GLM 5 Turbo logoGemini Pro 1.0 logo
GLM 5 Turbo vs Gemini Pro 1.0New provider
GLM 5 Turbo logoGemma 3 12B logo
GLM 5 Turbo vs Gemma 3 12BNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed