Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs GPT-4o (Omni)

Compare Z.ai: GLM 5.1 by Z-ai against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, context windows of 203K vs 128K, tested across 51 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 or GPT-4o (Omni)?

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and GPT-4o (Omni) are both competitive models. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). Context windows: 203K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and GPT-4o (Omni)

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 is made by z-ai while GPT-4o (Omni) is from openai. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window compared to GPT-4o (Omni)'s 128K. On pricing, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni).

Our Verdict
Z.ai: GLM 5.1
Z.ai: GLM 5.1
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-4o (Omni)

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
99%

GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji

Z.ai: GLM 5.1
GPT-4o (Omni)
54%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length18w
0.31Hedging0.72
3.6Bold7.3
2.6Lists5.6
0.00Emoji0.03
0.43Headings1.40
0.11Transitions0.26
Based on 27 + 24 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Z.ai: GLM 5.1GPT-4o (Omni)

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions