Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Z.ai: GLM 5.1 by Z-ai against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 203K vs 1.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 203K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 is made by z-ai while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Per 1M tokens
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 wins input (1.1× cheaper)·Llama 4 Maverick wins output (1.8× cheaper)
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Style Comparison
Llama 4 Maverick uses 2.5x more hedging
