GLM 5.1vsQwen3 Coder
Qwen3 Coder is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $0.22/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 5.1 | Qwen3 Coder |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.4/M tokens | $0.22/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.4/M tokens | $0.95/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
GLM 5.1
Qwen3 Coder
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Qwen3 Coder costs 4.6x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 5.1
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
Qwen3 Coder
Input
$0.22
6.4× cheaper
Output
$0.95
4.6× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder is cheaper on both: 6.4× input, 4.6× output.
Where to run it
20 hosts, cheapest first
GLM 5.115 hosts
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.96 in$3.03 out203k99.8% upStreamLakefp8$0.97 in$3.04 out200k99.6% upDeepInfrafp4$1.05 in$3.50 out203k100% upSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in$3.74 out205k99.9% upCrusoefp8$1.20 in$4.40 out203k99.8% upAtlasCloudfp8$1.26 in$3.96 out203k99.6% up
9 more hostsFewer hosts
Alibaba Cloudfp8$1.33 in$4.18 out203k100% upNovitafp8$1.38 in$4.40 out205k99.7% upFriendli$1.40 in$4.40 out203k99.9% upGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in$4.40 out203k99.2% upNebiusfp8$1.40 in$4.40 out203k90.8% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in$4.40 out203k99.7% upVenicefp8$1.54 in$4.84 out200k93.6% upChutesfp8degraded$0.98 in$3.08 out203k78% upPhaladegraded$1.21 in$4.20 out203k76.7% up
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
39%
Qwen3 Coder uses 37.5x more emoji
GLM 5.1
Qwen3 Coder
54%Vocabulary61%
18wSentence Length62w
0.31Hedging0.62
3.6Bold4.4
2.6Lists4.9
0.00Emoji0.37
0.43Headings1.31
0.11Transitions0.17
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
