Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare Z.ai: GLM 5.1 by Z-ai against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 203K vs 66K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are both competitive models. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 203K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 is made by z-ai while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
No community votes yet. On paper, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
