GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper than GPT-6 Astra Pro at $0.15/M vs $10/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6 Astra Pro has the edge: bigger model tier. GLM 5.3 Flash costs 100x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.15/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.5/M tokens | $50/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.3M tokens | 1.1M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $1.50 | $100 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 29 Sep 2026.
GLM 5.3 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while GPT-6 Astra Pro is developed by OpenAI. GLM 5.3 Flash has a 1.3M token context window vs GPT-6 Astra Pro's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 5 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT-6 Astra Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 5 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15/M input tokens and GPT-6 Astra Pro costs $10/M input tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash is $9.85/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT-6 Astra Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.