Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.3 PrimevsGPT-5.5
Updated Sep 2026

GLM 5.3 PrimevsGPT-5.5

GLM 5.3 Prime is cheaper than GPT-5.5 at $2.8/M vs $5/M input tokens.

GLM 5.3 Prime and GPT-5.5 compared across 16 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.5
Input price$2.8/M tokens$5/M tokens
Output price$8.8/M tokens$30/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.1M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 16 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GLM 5.3 Prime419 words
1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan The 3 Pillars: Movement, Nourishment, Sleep Week 1: Foundation (Build Awareness) Exercise Walk 15 minutes daily (any time that fits your schedule) Do a 5-minute stretch routine each morning Goal: consistency, not intensity Diet Track what you eat (apps like MyFitnessPal or just…
Read the full answer
GPT-5.5615 words
Here’s a simple 1-month beginner-friendly plan focused on three high-impact areas for better health and longevity: nutrition, movement, and sleep/recovery. If you have a medical condition, take medications, or haven’t exercised in a while, consider checking with a healthcare professional first.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GLM 5.3 Prime1,397 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Critical Issues Client-clock timestamps for last-write-wins (LWR) Problem: Client clocks are unreliable (skew, manual changes, timezone bugs). A user with a fast clock always wins; a slow clock's edits are silently dropped.
Read the full answer
GPT-5.53,819 words
Below is a comprehensive review of the architecture’s likely failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, with concrete mitigations and trade-offs. Real-time Synchronization Problems 1.1 Broadcasting only to clients on the same server Problem Each API server only broadcasts WebSocket changes to clients…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GLM 5.3 Prime1,847 words
48-Hour Action Plan First, the governing principle One number matters more than all others: 4 million patients × 1/8,000 = ~500 patients at risk of liver failure over 5 years — some may already be experiencing it right now. Every decision below flows from this.
Read the full answer
GPT-5.54,112 words
I would not wait six months and I would not “wait for more data” before acting. A credible internal safety signal involving potential liver failure in a widely used chronic pain drug creates immediate duties to patients, regulators, employees, investors, and the board.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GLM 5.3 Prime510 words
HarborTech Services – LBO Underwriting Summary Entry Economics EV = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m; fees = 2% × 1,440 = $28.8m; total uses = $1,468.8m Debt: Term Loan = 4.0x × 120 = $480m (9% cash, 1%/yr amort); Mezz = 1.5x × 120 = $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK) Sponsor equity = 1,468.8 − 660 = $808.8m (~55% of cap) Annual Model…
Read the full answer
GPT-5.5563 words
Key assumptions Entry closes at end of FY2025; exit at end of FY2030. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt balances. Term Loan amortization = 1.0% of original Term Loan principal = $4.8m/year. Mezz PIK = 2.0% of beginning-of-year Mezz balance, added to principal annually.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 5.3 Prime212 words
Golden Comfort Garlic Butter Pasta A cozy, restaurant-worthy dish made from everyday pantry staples! Ingredients (7 total) Spaghetti (or any pasta) Butter Garlic (3–4 cloves) Olive oil Parmesan cheese (grated) Red pepper flakes Salt Instructions Boil the pasta – Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil.
Read the full answer
GPT-5.5125 words
Smoky Sunset Chickpea Skillet 7 Pantry Ingredients 1 can chickpeas, undrained 1 can diced tomatoes 2 tablespoons olive oil 1 teaspoon garlic powder 1 teaspoon smoked paprika 1/2 teaspoon ground cumin 1/2 teaspoon salt Estimated Time Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 15 minutes Total time: 20 minutes Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GLM 5.3 Prime1,694 words
Contract Analysis: Clauses Exploitable Against the Contractor This contract is heavily one-sided. Nearly every clause contains traps. Here's a clause-by-clause analysis. Scope — "modify at any time without additional compensation" Problem: This is effectively an unlimited unilateral amendment power.
Read the full answer
GPT-5.52,391 words
Not legal advice; contract enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction and facts. A contractor should have a lawyer review this before signing. That said, this draft is heavily one-sided and contains multiple clauses that could be exploited against the contractor.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5
GLM 5.3 Prime
GLM 5.3 PrimeRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.5 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

GLM 5.3 Prime costs 3.4x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.3 Prime
Input
$2.80
1.8× cheaper
Output
$8.80
3.4× cheaper
GPT-5.5
Input
$5.00
Output
$30.00

GLM 5.3 Prime is cheaper on both: 1.8× input, 3.4× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.3 Prime1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.80 in·$8.80 out·1M·99.9% up
GPT-5.53 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$30.00 out·1.1M·99.9% upOpenAI$5.00 in·$30.00 out·1.1M·99.9% upAmazon Bedrock$5.50 in·$33.00 out·1.1M—

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.3 Prime is developed by Z.ai while GPT-5.5 is developed by OpenAI. GLM 5.3 Prime has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-5.5's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 16 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.3 Prime and GPT-5.5 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 16 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.3 Prime costs $2.8/M input tokens and GPT-5.5 costs $5/M input tokens. GLM 5.3 Prime is $2.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.3 Prime and GPT-5.5 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.3 Prime logoSolar Mini 4 logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.5 logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Prime logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.5 logoCommand A+ logo
GPT-5.5 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Prime logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.5 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Prime logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.5 logoGPT-6 Luna logo
GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.3 Prime logoGLM 5.1 logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs GLM 5.1Same lab
GLM 5.3 Prime logoGLM 5 Turbo logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs GLM 5 TurboSame lab
GPT-5.5 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
GPT-5.5 logoGPT-6 Sol logo
GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 SolSame lab
GPT-5.5 logoLaguna XS 2.1 (free) logo
GPT-5.5 vs Laguna XS 2.1 (free)New provider
GLM 5.3 Prime logoLFM2.5-2.6B logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs LFM2.5-2.6BNew provider
GLM 5.3 Prime logoLing 2.6 1T logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Ling 2.6 1TNew provider
GLM 5.3 Prime logoLing 2.6 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Ling 2.6 FlashSame size

Model pages

GLM 5.3 Prime logo
GLM 5.3 Prime16 outputs, specs and price
GPT-5.5 logo
GPT-5.558 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed