Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.3vsLlama 3.1 405B
Updated Aug 2026

GLM 5.3vsLlama 3.1 405B

GLM 5.3 is cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B at $0.6538/M vs $2.7/M input tokens.

GLM 5.3 and Llama 3.1 405B compared across 5 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.3Llama 3.1 405B
Input price$0.6538/M tokens$2.7/M tokens
Output price$2.0548/M tokens$3.1/M tokens
Context window1.3M tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Jul 2024
Our Verdict
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3
Llama 3.1 405B
Llama 3.1 405B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.3
Input
$0.65
4.1× cheaper
Output
$2.05
1.5× cheaper
Llama 3.1 405B
Input
$2.70
Output
$3.10

GLM 5.3 is cheaper on both: 4.1× input, 1.5× output.

Where to run it

30 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.330 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.65 in·$2.05 out·1M·99.8% upMMorph$0.71 in·$2.24 out·1M·99.8% upRRekafp8$0.76 in·$2.57 out·262k·99.4% upSSail Researchfp8$0.77 in·$4.00 out·1M·99.9% upNNovitafp8$0.78 in·$2.46 out·1M·99.9% upIio.netfp8$0.82 in·$2.77 out·262k·99.7% up
24 more hostsFewer hosts
PPhala$0.84 in·$2.64 out·1M·99.5% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.90 in·$3.00 out·1M·98% upIInferenceNetfp4$0.90 in·$3.00 out·1M·98% upDDigitalOcean$0.91 in·$2.86 out·1M·99.8% upIInceptronfp4$1.04 in·$3.39 out·1M·99.4% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.05 in·$3.30 out·1M·99.5% upMMakorafp4$1.05 in·$4.20 out·980k·97.3% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.12 in·$3.52 out·1M·99.7% upAlibaba Cloud$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·100% upDDecartfp4$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·99.1% upFFriendli$1.26 in·$3.96 out·1M·100% upAAkashMLfp8$1.30 in·$4.40 out·1M·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.4% upBBasetenfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.7% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1.3M·99.8% upCCrusoefp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.3% upFFireworks$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.5% upMistralnvfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.7% upModal$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99% upPParasailfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.1% upTTogether$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.1% upVVenice$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.8% upWWafer$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% up
Llama 3.1 405B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI while Llama 3.1 405B is developed by Meta AI. GLM 5.3 has a 1.3M token context window vs Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 5 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.3 and Llama 3.1 405B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 5 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.3 costs $0.6538/M input tokens and Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens. GLM 5.3 is $2.05/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.3 and Llama 3.1 405B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.3 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 405B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Llama 3.1 405B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoHy3 logo
GLM 5.3 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 405B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 405B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Llama 3.1 405B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GLM 5.3 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 405B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Llama 3.1 405B vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
Llama 3.1 405B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Llama 3.1 405B vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Llama 3.1 405B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Llama 3.1 405B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSame lab
GLM 5.3 logoNova Premier 1.0 logo
GLM 5.3 vs Nova Premier 1.0Same size
GLM 5.3 logoo1 logo
GLM 5.3 vs o1New provider
GLM 5.3 logoOpenAI o3 logo
GLM 5.3 vs OpenAI o3New provider
GLM 5.3 logoo3 Mini logo
GLM 5.3 vs o3 MiniNew provider

Model pages

GLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.313 outputs, specs and price
Llama 3.1 405B logo
Llama 3.1 405B12 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed