Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-3.5 TurbovsQwen3.7 Flash
Updated Jul 2026

GPT-3.5 TurbovsQwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo at $0.03/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.

GPT-3.5 Turbo and Qwen3.7 Flash compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecGPT-3.5 TurboQwen3.7 Flash
Input price$1.5/M tokens$0.03/M tokens
Output price$2/M tokens$0.13/M tokens
Context window16K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2022Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-3.5 Turbo289 words
Week 1: Diet Start by incorporating more whole, unprocessed foods into your meals such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and healthy fats. Begin by adding 1 extra serving of vegetables to your meals each day. Replace sugary drinks with water or herbal tea.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash763 words
🌱 30-Day Health & Longevity Starter Plan This plan focuses on the three most evidence-backed pillars of longevity: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep/Recovery. It’s designed for beginners: low barrier to entry, zero equipment required, and built on consistency over intensity. You’ll progress gradually so habits stick.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-3.5 Turbo134 words
Recipe: Honey Mustard Chicken Bake Ingredients: 4 boneless, skinless chicken breasts 1/2 cup honey 1/4 cup Dijon mustard 1 tablespoon olive oil 1 teaspoon garlic powder Salt and pepper to taste 1/2 cup shredded cheddar cheese Instructions: Preheat the oven to 375°F.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash332 words
🥔 Golden Crunch Smash-Roasted Potatoes A crowd-pleasing side dish that delivers maximum crispiness with minimal effort. By boiling then smashing the potatoes before roasting, you create a shatteringly crisp crust while keeping the inside fluffy. This recipe relies on just seven pantry staples for perfect flavor.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GPT-3.5 Turbo184 words
Problem: The claim that current BCI technology is too invasive is weak because it lacks specific evidence or examples to support it. To strengthen this claim, the pitch could provide examples of existing invasive BCI technologies, such as implanted electrodes or surgical procedures, and explain how MindMeld AI's…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash776 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch deck, along with why they raise red flags for sophisticated investors and how to concretely improve them. Weak Claim 1: Solution Slide "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-3.5 Turbo275 words
PAYMENT: The clause stating that payment is due within 90 days of invoice receipt could potentially be exploited against the contractor as it is a longer payment term than industry standard. This could result in cash flow issues for the contractor.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash1,322 words
This agreement contains several highly one-sided provisions that create significant legal, financial, and operational risks for the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying exploitation risks, recommended modifications, and the underlying legal reasoning. Note: Contract law varies by jurisdiction.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GPT-3.5 Turbo469 words
To an experienced software engineer, a large language model like GPT or Claude may seem like a black box, especially if they haven't delved into the world of machine learning. However, the underlying concept is not as complex as it may seem.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash1,038 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM’s training process less as “teaching” and more as optimizing a high-dimensional function across a petabyte-scale dataset, much like you’d architect a distributed system to handle massive throughput.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GPT-3.5 Turbo382 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, it would have potentially accelerated technological advancements in various fields and had significant implications on the global economy and geopolitics.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Flash1,381 words
This counterfactual traces a plausible diffusion curve for an early transistor invention, acknowledging that while the underlying physics could be known in 1920, practical adoption would be constrained by materials science, precision manufacturing, and institutional readiness.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 TurboRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.7 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Qwen3.7 Flash costs 15x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.00
Qwen3.7 Flash
Input
$0.03
50× cheaper
Output
$0.13
15× cheaper

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper on both: 50× input, 15× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

GPT-3.5 Turbo1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
OpenAI$0.50 in·$1.50 out·16k·100% up
Qwen3.7 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.03 in·$0.13 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-3.5 Turbo is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.7 Flash is developed by Qwen. GPT-3.5 Turbo has a 16K token context window vs Qwen3.7 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-3.5 Turbo and Qwen3.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $1.5/M input tokens and Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03/M input tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash is $1.47/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-3.5 Turbo and Qwen3.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-3.5 Turbo logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoHy3 logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 AstraVersion compare
Qwen3.7 Flash logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.7 Flash logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen3.7 Flash logoGemini 1.5 Pro logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Gemini 1.5 ProSame size
Qwen3.7 Flash logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025Same size
Qwen3.7 Flash logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewNew provider
Qwen3.7 Flash logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025New provider

Model pages

GPT-3.5 Turbo logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash13 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed