Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-4.1 NanovsGPT-6 Sol Pro
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-4.1 NanovsGPT-6 Sol Pro

GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper than GPT-6 Sol Pro at $0.1/M vs $2/M input tokens.

GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-6 Sol Pro compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.1 NanoGPT-6 Sol Pro
Input price$0.1/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$10/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.1M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 20 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-4.1 Nano895 words
Certainly! Here's an analysis of clauses in the provided contract that could potentially be exploited against the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: Clause: Scope (Section 1) Issue: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation."
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol Pro970 words
This is a strongly one-sided draft. Do not sign it as written. The enforceability of particular terms—especially the non-compete, payment provisions, and arbitration clause—depends on the governing jurisdiction, which the agreement does not identify.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-4.1 Nano742 words
Let's proceed step-by-step. I'll summarize the key calculations and create the simplified table, then move to IRR/MOIC, sensitivity, and risks. Initial Deal Assumptions Recap Entry EBITDA FY2025: $120m Entry EV: 12.0x EBITDA = 12.0 * 120 = $1,440m Transaction fees: 2.0% * $1,440m = $28.8m (paid from equity) Leverage at…
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol Pro331 words
HarborTech Services — simplified LBO ($m) Entry: Enterprise value = 12.0 × $120 = $1,440. Fees are $28.8; opening debt is a $480 term loan plus $180 mezzanine loan. Initial equity = $1,440 + $28.8 − $660 = $808.8. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year balances.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GPT-4.1 Nano685 words
Dish Name: Celestial Harmony – A Deconstructed Black Garlic & Blueberry Soufflé with Yuzu Foam and Edible Silver Dust Conceptual Narrative: This dish embodies the cosmic dance of contrasts—earth and sky, sweetness and umami, tradition and innovation.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol Pro913 words
Scallop, Green Strawberry & White Chocolate Seared scallops with charred kohlrabi, compressed green strawberry, white-chocolate–miso beurre blanc, kombu oil and buckwheat lace The unusual pairing is scallop and white chocolate.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GPT-4.1 Nano776 words
Let's analyze the architecture step-by-step to identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs. 1. Potential Failure Modes a.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol Pro1,277 words
The central problem is that this design treats concurrent edits as independent database writes, then tries to reconcile them with client timestamps. That can lose valid edits even when every component is working.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GPT-4.1 Nano892 words
Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: Long → 12-Month Price Target Range: $55–$65 Thesis: LedgerLift’s SaaS platform is positioned for sustained growth driven by expanding customer base and high retention, with scalable margins supporting a compelling valuation.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol Pro974 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Recommendation: Short 12-month price target: $30–$44 Thesis. LedgerLift has attractive subscription economics, but at $46 the stock prices in substantially more durable cash flow than the supplied operating assumptions produce: base-case DCF value is about $28 per share…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-4.1 Nano417 words
Certainly! Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep—three key areas for improving health and longevity. Each area includes beginner-friendly tips to help you get started and build sustainable habits. Week 1-4: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan 1.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol Pro230 words
A simple 1-month health plan Focus on food, movement, and sleep. Start small enough that you can repeat the habits most days. Week Food Movement Sleep 1: Set a baseline Add a fruit or vegetable to one meal each day. Walk for 10 minutes, 4 days this week. Pick a consistent wake-up time.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-6 Sol Pro
GPT-6 Sol Pro
GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 NanoRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6 Sol Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

GPT-4.1 Nano costs 25x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-4.1 Nano
Input
$0.10
20× cheaper
Output
$0.40
25× cheaper
GPT-6 Sol Pro
Input
$2.00
Output
$10.00

GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper on both: 20× input, 25× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts

GPT-4.1 Nano2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·100% upOpenAI$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·99.8% up
GPT-6 Sol Pro2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·99.9% upOpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by OpenAI but target different use cases. GPT-4.1 Nano has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-6 Sol Pro's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-6 Sol Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1/M input tokens and GPT-6 Sol Pro costs $2/M input tokens. GPT-4.1 Nano is $1.90/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-6 Sol Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-4.1 Nano logoSolar Mini 4 logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4.1 Nano logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4.1 Nano logoCommand A+ logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
GPT-4.1 Nano logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoGPT-6 Luna logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-4.1 Nano logoGPT-6 Luna logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 LunaSame lab
GPT-4.1 Nano logoGPT-6 Sol logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 SolSame lab
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoGPT-6 Sol logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs GPT-6 SolSame lab
GPT-4.1 Nano logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731New provider
GPT-4.1 Nano logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpNew provider
GPT-4.1 Nano logoDeepSeek V4 Pro logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 ProNew provider
GPT-4.1 Nano logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
GPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813New provider

Model pages

GPT-4.1 Nano logo
GPT-4.1 Nano55 outputs, specs and price
GPT-6 Sol Pro logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro20 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed