Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-4.1vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Updated Jul 2025

GPT-4.1vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than GPT-4.1 at $0.2/M vs $2/M input tokens.

GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.1Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input price$2/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Output price$8/M tokens$0.8/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens131K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2025
Our Verdict
GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-4.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 10x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-4.1
Input
$2.00
Output
$8.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
10× cheaper
Output
$0.80
10× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both: 10× input, 10× output.

Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-4.12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$8.00 out·1M·100% upOpenAI$2.00 in·$8.00 out·1M·99.6% up
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25074 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLake$0.05 in·$0.19 out·128k·98.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·97.7% upNNebiusfp8$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·95% upAlibaba Cloud$0.13 in·$0.52 out·131k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
66%

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 5.0x more emoji

GPT-4.1
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
58%Vocabulary55%
19wSentence Length19w
0.49Hedging0.46
8.8Bold6.4
5.8Lists3.9
0.22Emoji1.10
1.01Headings0.86
0.10Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoClaude Opus 4 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoClaude Opus 4.1 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGemini 2.0 Pro Experimental logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro ExperimentalNew provider
GPT-4.1 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17 logo
GPT-4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17New provider
GPT-4.1 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 logo
GPT-4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed