GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash
Compare GPT-4.1 by OpenAI against Qwen3 Coder Flash by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 39 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?
GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash are both competitive models. GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Qwen3 Coder Flash. Context windows: 1048K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
GPT-4.1 is made by openai while Qwen3 Coder Flash is from qwen. GPT-4.1 has a 1048K token context window compared to Qwen3 Coder Flash's 128K. On pricing, GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Qwen3 Coder Flash.
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-4.1 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Coder Flash is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
GPT-4.1 uses 23.7x more emoji
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.







