Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Coder Flash
Compare Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI against Qwen3 Coder Flash by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.50
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
5.0× cheaper
Output
$1.50
1.7× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 1.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
54%
Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 3.8x more sentence length
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Coder Flash
42%Vocabulary60%
24wSentence Length92w
0.76Hedging0.60
3.7Bold6.1
6.3Lists6.2
0.00Emoji0.00
0.74Headings1.64
0.11Transitions0.18
Based on 12 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
