Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Coder Flash
Compare Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI against Qwen3 Coder Flash by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 Coder Flash?
Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 Coder Flash are both competitive models. Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Qwen3 Coder Flash. Context windows: 1000K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 Coder Flash
Llama 4 Maverick is made by meta while Qwen3 Coder Flash is from qwen. Llama 4 Maverick has a 1000K token context window compared to Qwen3 Coder Flash's 128K. On pricing, Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Qwen3 Coder Flash.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 1.7× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 3.8x more sentence length
