GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Compare GPT-4.1 by OpenAI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by Qwen, in 10 community votes, gpt-4.1 wins 80% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
GPT-4.1 is the better choice overall, winning 80% of 10 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. Context windows: 1048K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
GPT-4.1 is made by openai while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is from qwen. GPT-4.1 has a 1048K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's 66K. On pricing, GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. In community voting, In 10 community votes, GPT-4.1 wins 80% of head-to-head duels.
In 10 community votes, GPT-4.1 wins 80% of head-to-head duels. GPT-4.1 leads in Web Design. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 10+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 13× input, 5.3× output
Pick GPT-4.1. In 10 blind votes, GPT-4.1 wins 80% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT-4.1 particularly excels in Web Design. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct uses 2.5x more emoji
