GPT-4.1
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare GPT-4.1 by OpenAI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, in 2 community votes, gpt-4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 66K, tested across 24 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
GPT-4.1 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 2 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 1048K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
GPT-4.1 is made by openai while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. GPT-4.1 has a 1048K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. In community voting, In 2 community votes, GPT-4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 2 community votes, GPT-4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 2+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Our Verdict
GPT-4.1Winner
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Pick GPT-4.1. In 2 blind votes, GPT-4.1 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Ask them anything
FAQ