Compare GPT-4.1 by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
GPT-4.1 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash are both competitive models. GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash. Context windows: 1048K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
GPT-4.1 is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash is from qwen. GPT-4.1 has a 1048K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash's 1000K. On pricing, GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper on both — 8.0× input, 5.3× output
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-4.1 has the edge — bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash uses 5.8x more emoji
Compare GPT-4.1 by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
GPT-4.1 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash are both competitive models. GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash. Context windows: 1048K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
GPT-4.1 is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash is from qwen. GPT-4.1 has a 1048K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash's 1000K. On pricing, GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper on both — 8.0× input, 5.3× output
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-4.1 has the edge — bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash uses 5.8x more emoji