GPT-4 vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Compare GPT-4 by OpenAI against Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by Moonshot AI, context windows of 8K vs 1.0M, tested across 10 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4 or Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?
GPT-4 and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct are both competitive models. GPT-4 costs $30/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct. Context windows: 8K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4 and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
GPT-4 is made by openai while Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is from moonshotai. GPT-4 has a 8K token context window compared to Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct's 1049K. On pricing, GPT-4 costs $30/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is 100x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct uses 37.7x more headings
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
