GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare GPT-4o mini by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, in 1 community votes, gpt-4o mini wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 10.0M, tested across 37 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-4o mini is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 128K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between GPT-4o mini and Llama 4 Scout

GPT-4o mini is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-4o mini has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. In community voting, In 1 community votes, GPT-4o mini wins 100% of head-to-head duels.

In 1 community votes, GPT-4o mini wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Our Verdict
GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o miniWinner
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up

Pick GPT-4o mini. In 1 blind votes, GPT-4o mini wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
94%

GPT-4o mini uses 5.2x more transitions

GPT-4o mini
Llama 4 Scout
54%Vocabulary43%
18wSentence Length42w
0.84Hedging0.81
3.8Bold4.1
3.3Lists7.3
0.00Emoji0.00
1.03Headings0.30
0.23Transitions0.04
Based on 22 + 10 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

GPT-4o miniLlama 4 Scout

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions