GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen3 30B A3B by Qwen, in 3 community votes, gpt-4o (omni) wins 67% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 41K, tested across 12 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen3 30B A3B?

GPT-4o (Omni) is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 3 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0/M for Qwen3 30B A3B. Context windows: 128K vs 41K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen3 30B A3B

GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen3 30B A3B is from qwen. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 41K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0/M for Qwen3 30B A3B. In community voting, In 3 community votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 67% of head-to-head duels.

In 3 community votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 67% of head-to-head duels. GPT-4o (Omni) leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 3+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Image Generation: GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-4o (Omni)Winner
Qwen3 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3BRunner-up

Pick GPT-4o (Omni). In 3 blind votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.

GPT-4o (Omni) particularly excels in Image Generation.

Clear winner
FAQ

This comparison gets 800+ views/month. Your brand could be here.

Advertise