GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 262K, tested across 23 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking?

GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking are both competitive models. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking. Context windows: 128K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking is from qwen. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking's 262K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking.

Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
vs

Ask them anything yourself

GPT-4o (Omni)Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
FAQ