GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-4o (Omni) has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is 6.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-4o (Omni)
Input
$2.50
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.15
17× cheaper
Output
$1.50
6.7× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 17× input, 6.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
42%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct uses 23.5x more emoji
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
54%Vocabulary52%
18wSentence Length16w
0.72Hedging0.20
7.3Bold5.8
5.6Lists3.7
0.03Emoji0.59
1.40Headings0.96
0.26Transitions0.05
Based on 24 + 20 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
