GPT-4o (Omni)
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 66K, tested across 47 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct are both competitive models. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. Context windows: 128K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is from qwen. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's 66K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct.
Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-4o (Omni) has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is 6.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Ask them anything
FAQ