GPT-4o (Omni)
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, in 1 community votes, qwen3 next 80b a3b thinking wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 66K, tested across 33 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 128K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 1 community votes, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Our Verdict
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingWinner
GPT-4o (Omni)Runner-up
Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. In 1 blind votes, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 6.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Ask them anything
FAQ