GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 51 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?
GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 are both competitive models. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20. Context windows: 128K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is from qwen. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's 1000K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is cheaper on both — 6.3× input, 4.2× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 uses 61.1x more emoji
