Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.1-CodexvsLing 3.0 Flash
Updated Jul 2026

GPT-5.1-CodexvsLing 3.0 Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper than GPT-5.1-Codex at $0.021/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

GPT-5.1-Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash compared across 16 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.1-CodexLing 3.0 Flash
Input price$1.25/M tokens$0.021/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$0.063/M tokens
Context window400K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedNov 2025Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 2 of the 16 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-5.1-Codex117 words
Recipe: Cloud-Burst Cinnamon Oat Cups Ingredients (7 total): Rolled oats – 1 cup Honey – 2 tbsp Peanut butter (or any nut butter) – 3 tbsp Cinnamon – ½ tsp Vanilla extract – ½ tsp Dried cranberries (or raisins) – ¼ cup Pinch of salt Instructions: In a bowl, microwave peanut butter and honey for 20 seconds just to…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash248 words
🍝 Honey Fire Twirls A sticky-sweet, spicy, savory pasta that comes together in minutes. 🧺 Ingredients (7 pantry staples) Spaghetti (or penne) — 8 oz Olive oil — 2 tablespoons Garlic, minced — 4 cloves Honey — 3 tablespoons Soy sauce — 2 tablespoons Red pepper flakes — ½ teaspoon (adjust to taste) Parmesan cheese…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-5.1-Codex492 words
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on three key areas—Nutrition, Movement, and Rest & Recovery—to kickstart better health and longevity. Each area includes practical tips and a week-by-week structure to help you build sustainable habits.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash568 words
🌱 Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan 🥦 1. Diet — Nourish, Don't Deprive Week 1: Awareness Keep a food journal — just track what you eat (no judgment). This alone builds mindful eating habits. Add, don't subtract — introduce one extra serving of vegetables per meal.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.1-Codex
GPT-5.1-Codex
Ling 3.0 Flash
Ling 3.0 Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Ling 3.0 Flash costs 159x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input
$0.02
60× cheaper
Output
$0.06
159× cheaper

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper on both: 60× input, 159× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-5.1-Codex1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$1.25 in·$10.00 out·400k·100% up
Ling 3.0 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0.02 in·$0.06 out·262k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.06 in·$0.18 out·131k·99.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-5.1-Codex is developed by OpenAI while Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by inclusionAI. GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400K token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 16 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.1-Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 16 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.021/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash is $1.23/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.1-Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.1-Codex logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-5.1-Codex vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.1-Codex logoHy3 logo
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.1-Codex logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.1-Codex logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.1-Codex logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.1-Codex vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
GPT-5.1-Codex logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-5.1-Codex vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash logoInkling logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs InklingSame size
Ling 3.0 Flash logoINTELLECT-3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs INTELLECT-3New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash logoKimi K2 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Kimi K2Same size
Ling 3.0 Flash logoKimi K2 0905 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Kimi K2 0905Same size

Model pages

GPT-5.1-Codex logo
GPT-5.1-Codex53 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash16 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed