GPT-5.1-Codex
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare GPT-5.1-Codex by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 400K vs 10.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5.1-Codex or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-5.1-Codex and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 400K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5.1-Codex and Llama 4 Scout
GPT-5.1-Codex is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Our Verdict
GPT-5.1-Codex
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.1-Codex has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Llama 4 Scout is 20x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
94%
GPT-5.1-Codex uses 8.8x more transitions
GPT-5.1-Codex
Llama 4 Scout
70%Vocabulary43%
17wSentence Length42w
0.39Hedging0.81
3.4Bold4.1
3.5Lists7.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.50Headings0.30
0.38Transitions0.04
Based on 14 + 10 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ