Compare GPT-5.1-Codex by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 400K vs 10.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
GPT-5.1-Codex and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 400K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
GPT-5.1-Codex is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 20× output
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.1-Codex has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Llama 4 Scout is 20x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
GPT-5.1-Codex uses 8.8x more transitions
Compare GPT-5.1-Codex by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 400K vs 10.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
GPT-5.1-Codex and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 400K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
GPT-5.1-Codex is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 20× output
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.1-Codex has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Llama 4 Scout is 20x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
GPT-5.1-Codex uses 8.8x more transitions