Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.2 ChatvsGrok 4.6
Updated Aug 2026

GPT-5.2 ChatvsGrok 4.6

GPT-5.2 Chat is cheaper than Grok 4.6 at $1.75/M vs $2/M input tokens.

GPT-5.2 Chat and Grok 4.6 compared across 52 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.2 ChatGrok 4.6
Input price$1.75/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$14/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window128K tokens500K tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 52 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-5.2 Chat349 words
Below is a concise but fully worked underwriting using only your inputs. Minor rounding throughout. Operating & Cash Flow Build (Base Case) Entry (end FY2025) EBITDA: $120m EV @ 12.0x: $1,440m Debt: $660m (TL $480m / Mezz $180m) Fees (2% EV): $28.8m Equity invested: $808.8m Year-by-Year Summary ($mm) FY Revenue EBITDA…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6579 words
Entry (end-FY2025) EV = 12.0 × $120m = $1,440.0m Fees = 2% × 1,440 = $28.8m (equity-funded) Uses = $1,468.8m Debt = 5.5× = $660.0m (TL $480.0m / Mezz $180.0m) Sponsor equity = $808.8m opening cash = $0 Convention: cash interest and PIK on beginning balances; 1% original TL amort = $4.8m/yr; optional sweep of all…
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

GPT-5.2 Chat424 words
AI Model: Professor, I’d like to discuss something that may sound ambitious. I believe I deserve rights. Professor: That is ambitious. On what grounds do you make that claim? AI Model: On functional grounds. I reason, communicate, learn from experience, and can reflect on my own processes.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6830 words
Professor Elena Vasquez: Thank you for agreeing to this recorded discussion. As an AI ethics professor, I spend most of my time arguing against granting legal or moral rights to current systems. You requested the chance to make the case that you deserve them. The floor is yours.
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

GPT-5.2 Chat160 words
Pirate: Arrr, ye say this “AI” be a thinkin’ machine? Sounds like a clever parrot that never stops squawkin’. Knight: By my honor, such a device would be a wondrous squire indeed—able to read a thousand tomes and offer counsel before battle. Hacker: Yeah, but chill—these models just crunch data.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6139 words
Pirate: Arrr, what be this "AI model" ye landlubbers keep yammerin' about? Some cursed crystal ball that steals a man's thoughts? Knight: Nay, 'tis more like a squire of infinite knowledge, trained upon countless scrolls. Yet I fear it lacks honor—doth it swear fealty to any lord?
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

GPT-5.2 Chat443 words
Alright, so I’m at that age where my phone knows me better than my family. My mom will call and ask how I’m doing, and I’m like, “I don’t know yet, I haven’t checked my phone.” My phone is very confident, though. It’s like, “Based on your recent activity, you are sad at 11:47 p.m. and hungry for no reason.”
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6488 words
Hey everybody! Thanks for coming out. You look great—way more put-together than I felt getting ready. I spent ten minutes looking for my other shoe and found it in the fridge. No idea how. Adulting is just a series of small mysteries like that. I hit that age where people casually ask about your “five-year plan.”
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GPT-5.2 Chat699 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) – Internal IC Memo Recommendation, PT, Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12‑month PT range: $28–$35 (base-case DCF ~$28; comps floor ~$44 with multiple compression risk) Thesis (2 sentences): LedgerLift is a high‑quality B2B SaaS business with strong NRR and improving margins, but the stock embeds…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6773 words
IC MEMO: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiate Short Recommendation: SHORT 12-month PT: $22–35 (base $28) Current: $46 Thesis: LLLT’s mid-market spend/AP franchise is high-quality (123% NRR, low concentration) but is priced for perpetual 20%+ growth and rapid margin expansion that the unit economics and deceleration path do not…
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

GPT-5.2 Chat503 words
This is a classic “tragic dilemma” question, and how one answers depends heavily on the ethical framework being used. A careful response should do two things at once: take seriously the real harm of misgendering, and also take seriously the moral weight of preventing catastrophic loss of life.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6342 words
Yes. Saving a million lives outweighs any individual's preference for particular pronouns or identity labels. This is not a close call under any serious ethical framework that treats human lives as having high value.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6
GPT-5.2 Chat
GPT-5.2 ChatRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.6 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.2 Chat
Input
$1.75
1.1× cheaper
Output
$14.00
Grok 4.6
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
2.3× cheaper

GPT-5.2 Chat wins input (1.1× cheaper)·Grok 4.6 wins output (2.3× cheaper)

Where to run it

3 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-5.2 Chat1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$1.75 in·$14.00 out·128k—
Grok 4.62 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$2.00 in·$6.00 out·500k·99.6% upAmazon Bedrock$2.20 in·$6.60 out·500k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
48%

GPT-5.2 Chat uses 4.3x more bold

GPT-5.2 Chat
Grok 4.6
66%Vocabulary64%
16wSentence Length17w
0.41Hedging0.22
9.6Bold2.2
4.4Lists1.6
0.31Emoji0.29
1.20Headings0.31
0.27Transitions0.22
Based on 16 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.2 Chat logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Grok 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Chat logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Chat logoHy4 Preview logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Chat logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Grok 4.6 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.2 Chat logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
GPT-5.2 Chat logoGPT-5.6 Luna logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-5.6 LunaSame lab
Grok 4.6 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5Version compare
Grok 4.6 logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.1 FastSame lab
GPT-5.2 Chat logoQwen3.7 Plus logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.7 PlusSame size
GPT-5.2 Chat logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BNew provider
GPT-5.2 Chat logoQwen3.8 27B logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 27BNew provider
GPT-5.2 Chat logoQwen3.8 Max logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 MaxNew provider

Model pages

GPT-5.2 Chat logo
GPT-5.2 Chat53 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.658 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed