Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.2 ProvsLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-5.2 ProvsLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)

Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro at $0/M vs $21/M input tokens.

GPT-5.2 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) compared across 16 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.2 ProLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Input price$21/M tokensFree
Output price$168/M tokensFree
Context window400K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedDec 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 3 of the 16 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-5.2 Pro837 words
A simple, actionable 1‑month plan (3 pillars: Nutrition, Movement, Sleep/Recovery) Goal for the month: build repeatable “default” habits (not perfection). Time required: ~45–75 min/day total (mostly walking + sleep routine).
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)493 words
🌱 Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan 🥗 Key Area 1: Diet — Nourish Your Body Week 1: Add one extra serving of vegetables to your day (e.g., a handful of spinach in your morning eggs or a side salad at dinner). Week 2: Swap one sugary drink (soda, juice, sweetened coffee) per day for water or herbal tea.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GPT-5.2 Pro484 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) — Internal IC Memo (Long/Short Equity) Recommendation, PT, thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-month PT range: $28–$40 (midpoint $34) Thesis (2 sentences): LLLT is a high-quality B2B spend/AP automation SaaS business (92% subscription, 123% NRR, 78% FY25 GM) but the stock prices in a longer runway of…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)1,203 words
INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO — LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) Classification: Internal — Investment Committee Date: June 2025 Analyst: [Portfolio Team] Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month Price Target Range: $28–$38 (base-to-bull DCF; downside to $17 in bear) Thesis: LLLT trades at ~$46 (mkt cap ~$8.7B, EV ~$7.3B)…
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-5.2 Pro161 words
Entry (close end of FY2025) FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Entry EV = 12.0x = 12.0 × 120.0 = $1,440.0m Transaction fees = 2.0% EV = 0.02 × 1,440.0 = $28.8m (equity-funded) Debt at close (5.5x EBITDA = 5.5 × 120 = $660m): Term Loan = 4.0x = $480.0m Mezzanine = 1.5x = $180.0m Equity check Uses = 1,440.0 + 28.8 = $1,468.8m…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)576 words
HarborTech Services (HTS) — LBO Underwriting Analysis ENTRY SUMMARY (End FY2025) Item Value FY2025 EBITDA $120.0m Purchase EV (12.0x) $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (2.0%) $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan (4.0x) $480.0m Mezzanine (1.5x) $180.0m Total Debt $660.0m Equity Check $808.8m YEAR-BY-YEAR MODEL (FY2026–FY2030…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro
Input
$21.00
Output
$168.00
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

2 hosts

GPT-5.2 Pro1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
OpenAI$21.00 in·$168.00 out·400k·100% up
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovitabf16$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-5.2 Pro is developed by OpenAI while Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is developed by inclusionAI. GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400K token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 16 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.2 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 16 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is $21.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.2 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.2 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Pro logoHy3 logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Pro logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Pro logoGLM 5.3 logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.2 Pro logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
GPT-5.2 Pro logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Same size
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLlama 4 Scout logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoMercury logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs MercuryNew provider

Model pages

GPT-5.2 Pro logo
GPT-5.2 Pro31 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)18 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed