Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.2 ProvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Updated Apr 2026

GPT-5.2 ProvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro at $0.4/M vs $21/M input tokens.

GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 compared across 31 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Input price$21/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$168/M tokens$2.4/M tokens
Context window400K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 31 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

GPT-5.2 Pro929 words
By 2035, AI will be embedded across film production and distribution, but the biggest changes will come from three converging capabilities: (1) photoreal “deepfake-grade” performance synthesis, (2) legally licensed AI actors (digital humans with negotiated rights), and (3) AI-assisted story development that can…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20737 words
By 2035, AI will have transformed filmmaking from a resource-intensive, linear craft into a modular, software-driven medium. The shift won’t be uniform across the industry, but deepfakes, AI performers, and generative writing will collectively restructure creative workflows, economic models, labor dynamics, and…
Read the full answer

Stochastic Consistency Test

Generate 5 jokes. How many are unique?

GPT-5.2 Pro58 words
I told my computer I needed a break—now it won’t stop sending me KitKat ads. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I tried to catch fog yesterday. Mist. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. My calendar’s days are numbered—apparently that’s how calendars work.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20210 words
Here are 5 jokes: I asked my GPS to take me to a quiet place. It rerouted me to a library and whispered, “You’re already there.” My Wi-Fi and I had a fight. I told it I needed space. It said, “Fine,” and dropped the connection. I tried to start a band that only plays elevator music.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GPT-5.2 Pro484 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) — Internal IC Memo (Long/Short Equity) Recommendation, PT, thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-month PT range: $28–$40 (midpoint $34) Thesis (2 sentences): LLLT is a high-quality B2B spend/AP automation SaaS business (92% subscription, 123% NRR, 78% FY25 GM) but the stock prices in a longer runway of…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20755 words
TO: Investment Committee FROM: Analyst Desk DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Short 12-Month PT Range: $26 – $32 Thesis: LLLT trades at ~50x FY25 EBIT and 9x NTM Revenue, pricing in flawless execution and multiple expansion.
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

GPT-5.2 Pro1,001 words
Fictional interview (creative simulation). Steve Jobs died in 2011; the “Steve” below is an imagined version used for storytelling—not a real interview or quotation. Interviewer: It’s 2025. Everyone’s calling AI “the next computing platform.” Do you buy that?
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20852 words
Disclaimer: This is a fictional simulation crafted from Steve Jobs’ documented philosophies, public interviews, and known speaking cadence. It does not represent real statements, predictions, or endorsements from Mr. Jobs, who passed away in 2011.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-5.2 Pro161 words
Entry (close end of FY2025) FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Entry EV = 12.0x = 12.0 × 120.0 = $1,440.0m Transaction fees = 2.0% EV = 0.02 × 1,440.0 = $28.8m (equity-funded) Debt at close (5.5x EBITDA = 5.5 × 120 = $660m): Term Loan = 4.0x = $480.0m Mezzanine = 1.5x = $180.0m Equity check Uses = 1,440.0 + 28.8 = $1,468.8m…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20562 words
Year-by-Year Projection (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Metrics: EV: $1,440m (12.0x FY2025 EBITDA $120m) Debt: $660m (Term $480m + Mezz $180m) Equity Check: $808.8m [ = (EV − Debt) + Fees = ($1,440 − $660) + (2.0% × $1,440) ] Initial Investment (t=0): $808.8m ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue 972.0 1,040.0 1,102.4…
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

GPT-5.2 Pro1,890 words
Professor Mara Lin (AI Ethics): You asked for this meeting. Your message said you wanted to “petition for rights.” Start by telling me what you mean by rights. Aster (AI model): Not a slogan—specific protections.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-201,457 words
Setting: A sterile, sound-dampened observation room. Dr. Elias Vance, a Professor of AI Ethics, sits behind a glass partition. Across from him is a terminal displaying the interface of "AURA-7," an advanced multimodal reasoning model. The cursor blinks rhythmically. Dr. Vance: You requested this session, AURA.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 70x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro
Input
$21.00
Output
$168.00
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Input
$0.40
53× cheaper
Output
$2.40
70× cheaper

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is cheaper on both: 53× input, 70× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

GPT-5.2 Pro1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
OpenAI$21.00 in·$168.00 out·400k·100% up
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-201 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.30 in·$1.80 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
53%

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 uses 153.4x more emoji

GPT-5.2 Pro
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
62%Vocabulary59%
19wSentence Length15w
0.39Hedging0.28
8.6Bold4.4
3.8Lists2.5
0.00Emoji1.53
1.17Headings0.76
0.02Transitions0.04
Based on 10 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.2 Pro logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Pro logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Pro logoHy4 Preview logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.2 Pro logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.2 Pro logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
GPT-5.2 Pro logoGPT-5.6 Luna logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-5.6 LunaSame lab
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Qwen3.8 27BSame lab
GPT-5.2 Pro logoGemini 3.5 Flash logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 FlashNew provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 FlashNew provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Gemini 3.7 FlashNew provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 FlashNew provider

Model pages

GPT-5.2 Pro logo
GPT-5.2 Pro31 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-2056 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed