Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.2 ProvsQwen3.6 27B
Updated Apr 2026

GPT-5.2 ProvsQwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro at $0.325/M vs $21/M input tokens.

GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3.6 27B compared across 31 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.2 ProQwen3.6 27B
Input price$21/M tokens$0.325/M tokens
Output price$168/M tokens$3.25/M tokens
Context window400K tokens256K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2026
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro
Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3.6 27B costs 52x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro
Input
$21.00
Output
$168.00
Qwen3.6 27B
Input
$0.33
65× cheaper
Output
$3.25
52× cheaper

Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper on both: 65× input, 52× output.

Where to run it

7 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-5.2 Pro1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
OpenAI$21.00 in·$168.00 out·400k·100% up
Qwen3.6 27B6 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
CChutesfp8$0.30 in·$2.00 out·262k·97.8% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.32 in·$3.20 out·262k·93% upVVenicefp8$0.33 in·$3.25 out·256k·99.4% upAlibaba Cloud$0.45 in·$2.70 out·262k·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8degraded$0.30 in·$3.20 out·262k·91.5% upPPhaladegraded$0.32 in·$2.70 out·262k·94.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 8 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
50%

Qwen3.6 27B uses 154.4x more emoji

GPT-5.2 Pro
Qwen3.6 27B
62%Vocabulary62%
19wSentence Length16w
0.39Hedging0.28
8.6Bold4.3
3.8Lists2.1
0.00Emoji1.54
1.17Headings0.68
0.02Transitions0.05
Based on 10 + 25 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GPT-5.2 Pro logoOx Alpha logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoMiniMax M3 logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs MiniMax M3New provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoClaude Opus 4 logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Claude Opus 4New provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoKimi K2.6 logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Kimi K2.6New provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoKimi K2.7 Code logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 CodeNew provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoKimi K3 logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Kimi K3New provider
GPT-5.2 Pro logoKimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct logo
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B InstructNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed