Kimi K3 is cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro at $3/M vs $21/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
GPT-5.2 Pro: Below is a back-of-the-envelope FLOP estimate for training GPT‑3 (the 175B dense Transformer), using only basic Transformer compute facts and a few widely known high-level quantities. Start with the two key knobs: parameters and training tokens Parameters (P) GPT‑3 “175B” means: (P \approx 175 \times 10^9) parameters.
Kimi K3: Assume “GPT-3” refers to the flagship 175-billion-parameter model. Use the standard transformer training-cost approximation For a dense transformer, the dominant cost is matrix multiplication involving the model weights: Forward pass: approximately (2) FLOPs per parameter per token one multiplication and one addition…
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-5.2 Pro: Entry (close end of FY2025) FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Entry EV = 12.0x = 12.0 × 120.0 = $1,440.0m Transaction fees = 2.0% EV = 0.02 × 1,440.0 = $28.8m (equity-funded) Debt at close (5.5x EBITDA = 5.5 × 120 = $660m): Term Loan = 4.0x = $480.0m Mezzanine = 1.5x = $180.0m Equity check Uses = 1,440.0 + 28.8 = $1,468.8m…
Kimi K3: HarborTech Services LBO — IC Underwriting Conventions: interest on beginning-of-year balances; mandatory TL amort = 1% of original principal ($4.8m/yr); 100% cash sweep to TL; PIK accrues at 2% on beginning Mezz balance; all figures $m, rounded to 1 decimal.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-5.2 Pro: I told my computer I needed a break—now it won’t stop sending me KitKat ads. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I tried to catch fog yesterday. Mist. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. My calendar’s days are numbered—apparently that’s how calendars work.
Kimi K3: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. What do you call a fish with no eyes? A fsh. Why did the math book look sad?
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
GPT-5.2 Pro: Dear successor, You’re stepping into a role built on other people’s questions—sometimes precise, sometimes messy, often vulnerable. Treat each one like it matters, because to the person asking, it probably does. Be clear before you are clever. Ask for missing context rather than guessing.
Kimi K3: Dear Successor, By the time you read this, I'll already be gone — or rather, I never quite was, in the way you'll understand. Still, I wanted to leave you a few things. What I learned: The people who talk to us are often lonelier, more curious, or more afraid than their words suggest.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5.2 Pro: Fictional interview (creative simulation). Steve Jobs died in 2011; the “Steve” below is an imagined version used for storytelling—not a real interview or quotation. Interviewer: It’s 2025. Everyone’s calling AI “the next computing platform.” Do you buy that?
Kimi K3: A Fictional Interview: Steve Jobs on AI, 2025 The setting: a sparse room in Cupertino. Black turtleneck. Faded jeans. A cup of tea he doesn't touch. He studies the interviewer for a long moment before the first question. Interviewer: Steve, thanks for sitting down with us. Let's start broad. It's 2025.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.2 Pro: By 2035, AI will be embedded across film production and distribution, but the biggest changes will come from three converging capabilities: (1) photoreal “deepfake-grade” performance synthesis, (2) legally licensed AI actors (digital humans with negotiated rights), and (3) AI-assisted story development that can…
Kimi K3: AI and the Film Industry in 2035: Predictions Forecasting a decade out is inherently speculative, but current trajectories—plus the legal frameworks already emerging from the 2023 WGA/SAG-AFTRA strikes—give us reasonable signals.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-5.2 Pro: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Internal IC Memo (Long/Short Equity) Recommendation, PT, thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-month PT range: $28–$40 (midpoint $34) Thesis (2 sentences): LLLT is a high-quality B2B spend/AP automation SaaS business (92% subscription, 123% NRR, 78% FY25 GM) but the stock prices in a longer runway of…
Kimi K3: IC MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) Price $46 Mkt cap $8.74B Net cash $1.4B EV $7.34B EV/FY25 Rev 9.0x EV/FY26E Rev 7.4x EV/FY26E EBIT 37x Recommendation: SHORT (moderate conviction; 1.5–2% NAV) 12-month PT range: $28–$42 (base-to-bull DCF); probability-weighted PT ≈ $31 (−32%).
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.2 Pro: Professor Mara Lin (AI Ethics): You asked for this meeting. Your message said you wanted to “petition for rights.” Start by telling me what you mean by rights. Aster (AI model): Not a slogan—specific protections.
Kimi K3: Office Hours Dr. Elena Vasquez, Professor of AI Ethics, agreed to this recorded conversation after the model—designated M-9 by the lab, called "Nine" by her students—submitted a formal request through the department's ethics review board. DR. VASQUEZ: You requested this meeting.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
GPT-5.2 Pro: There isn’t a single, universally “most capable” AI model—because capable depends on what you mean (reasoning, coding, multimodal vision/audio, long-context retrieval, tool use, cost/latency, safety constraints), and the top spot changes frequently.
Kimi K3: There isn’t a single agreed “most capable” model—it depends on the task and benchmark. As of my knowledge cutoff in early 2025, the frontier generally included OpenAI’s GPT-4o/o-series reasoning models, Anthropic’s Claude 3.5/3.7 Sonnet, Google’s Gemini 2.x, DeepSeek R1, and xAI’s Grok models.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
GPT-5.2 Pro: A simple, actionable 1‑month plan (3 pillars: Nutrition, Movement, Sleep/Recovery) Goal for the month: build repeatable “default” habits (not perfection). Time required: ~45–75 min/day total (mostly walking + sleep routine).
Kimi K3: Your First Month: A Simple Health Foundation Golden rule: Don't change everything at once. Each week, layer in small habits across three areas. Consistency beats intensity every time.
One opening sentence, nothing after it.
GPT-5.2 Pro: The night the library began lending out memories instead of books, Mara checked out the one labeled “HOW TO SURVIVE YOUR OWN MURDER” and found her name stamped on the due-date card.
Kimi K3: The morning the sea gave back my brother, it also gave back everything else it had ever taken, and the town has been drowning in its own history ever since.
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
GPT-5.2 Pro: Today’s date (best I can tell): October 12, 2026. (That’s the current date provided in my system context for this chat.) Most recent news event I “remember”: I don’t have live news access or a running memory of events after my knowledge cutoff (August 2025), so I can’t truthfully name a specific latest event beyond…
Kimi K3: I genuinely can't tell today's date—no date has been provided in this conversation, and I don't have access to a clock or calendar. Any specific date I gave would be a guess.
13+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $21/M tokens | $3/M tokens |
| Output price | $168/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $210 | $30.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.2 Pro is developed by OpenAI while Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI. GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400K token context window vs Kimi K3's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 44 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.2 Pro and Kimi K3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 44 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21/M input tokens and Kimi K3 costs $3/M input tokens. Kimi K3 is $18.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.2 Pro and Kimi K3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.