GPT-5.2
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-5.2 vs Mistral Large
Compare GPT-5.2 by OpenAI against Mistral Large by Mistral AI, in 10 community votes, gpt-5.2 wins 80% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 400K vs 32K, tested across 24 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Mistral Large?
GPT-5.2 is the better choice overall, winning 80% of 10 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens vs $8/M for Mistral Large. Context windows: 400K vs 32K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5.2 and Mistral Large
GPT-5.2 is made by openai while Mistral Large is from mistral. GPT-5.2 has a 400K token context window compared to Mistral Large's 32K. On pricing, GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens vs $8/M for Mistral Large. In community voting, In 10 community votes, GPT-5.2 wins 80% of head-to-head duels.
In 10 community votes, GPT-5.2 wins 80% of head-to-head duels. GPT-5.2 leads in Web Design. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 10+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Web Design: GPT-5.2 wins 89% of votes
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2Winner
Mistral LargeRunner-up
Pick GPT-5.2. In 10 blind votes, GPT-5.2 wins 80% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT-5.2 particularly excels in Web Design.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
Mistral Large uses 5.2x more emoji
GPT-5.2
Mistral Large
64%Vocabulary49%
16wSentence Length19w
0.34Hedging0.86
9.4Bold8.9
3.9Lists5.4
0.06Emoji0.31
0.89Headings1.01
0.31Transitions0.10
Based on 15 + 16 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ