What is the difference between Mistral Nemo and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

Mistral Nemo is developed by Mistral AI while Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is developed by Qwen. Mistral Nemo has a 128K token context window vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 37 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

It depends on your use case. Mistral Nemo and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 37 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Mistral Nemo cost compared to Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

Mistral Nemo costs $0.03/M input tokens and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs $0.4/M input tokens. Mistral Nemo is $0.37/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Mistral Nemo and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mistral Nemo and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Sep 2025

Mistral NemovsQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Mistral Nemo is cheaper than Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) at $0.03/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Mistral Nemo and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) compared across 37 shared prompts
Spec	Mistral Nemo	Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input price	$0.03/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Output price	$0.07/M tokens	$4/M tokens
Context window	128K tokens	1.0M tokens
Weights	Open	—
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Jul 2024	Sep 2025